Answer:
Leadership comes in all form
Explanation:
In the passage, Boadicea is depicted as a brave leader who motivates her army to be brave and fearless. She is dedicated not to surrender and lose the battle. Even though she is in advantage, she does not stop, she continues to motivate her army and not to give up on her goal and intentions.
At this time of war, Rome condemns and restricts women from their rights. She is a wise leader and she replies to Roman's proposal to emphasize the British fight for liberty. Her role is quite important because she proves all prejudice discrimination. She is a strong woman who led her army to victory.
<span>1) Gracie and Helen had not seen each other FOR 50 years.
2) "Tell me ABOUT Grandpa." said Randy.
3) They carried the water packs ON their backs.
4) I would go INTO the garden, but it is muddy.
5) Tommy passed the peas TO his mother.
6) We should meet somewhere BEYOND the city limits.
7) The lights activate automatically AFTER sunset.
8) Please put an umbrella IN the trunk.
9) Add pepper TO the soup.
10) Erika waded INTO the stream and looked at the minnows.</span>
Answer:
<em>You didn't put any context, but that line doesn't not sound like an end to a romantic poem, nor does it sound very metephorical. It sounds as if Wilde left or commited an action that perhaps his wife did not agree with, and is using this poem to help her "understand". SO B</em>
The fallacy of <em>logos</em> is "the last time it rained, our local sports team won. It is raining today, so they will win tonight". It's logos because in order to persuade a target audience it uses a statement empowered by logic. The logical reasoning suggests that if the last time the match was played was raining and they won, now that it's raining again, the will win again. The logical thought is that <em>when it rains, the local team wins.</em>
The fallacy of <em>pathos</em> is "If we don't pass this environmental protection bill now, the world will probably end soon". It's pathos because this fallacy tries to persuade by provoking certain emotions or feelings to readers. In this way, the statement is more appalling to the reader and it feels more emotionally attached to it. By talking about the end of the world, the writer is<em> </em><em>trying to evoke feelings of awareness, sorrow and frightening.</em> So by provoking these feelings, <em>readers may become more aware and concerned</em> about the environmental changes that the human kind needs to make now in order to prevent the complete destruction of our world.
The fallacy of <em>ethos</em> is "My favorite teacher said that we should vote for Mr.Martinez, so I believe he is the best". It's ethos because the writer is convincing people by the credibility or authority of the speaker. In this case, the teacher represents a credible and respectful figure. So the reader <em>decides to vote for whom the teacher said just because THE teacher said that.</em>
i would use number 1 & lastly number 3 i hope this helps
