answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IgorLugansk [536]
2 years ago
13

Hillsdale is considering two options for comparable computer software. Option A will cost $25,000 plus annual license renewals o

f $1,000 for three years, which includes technical support Option B will cost $20,000 with technical support being an add-on charge. The estimated cost of technical support is $4,000 the first year, $3,000 the second year, and $2,000 the third year. Assume the software is purchased and paid for at the beginning of year one, but that technical support is paid for at the end of each year. Interest is at 8%. Ignore income taxes.
Required: Determine which option should be chosen based on present value considerations.

Business
1 answer:
Jlenok [28]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Option a should be selected

Explanation:

After considering the PV of both options A and B the option that has been selected is A.

For option A:-

A total of the present value of option A= -25000-925.926-857.339-793.832 = -27577.097

Present value = 27577

For option B,:-

Total = -20,000-3703.704-2572.017-1587.664

= -27863.385

The present value of option B = 27863

From the calculations I have attached, it is evident that option A has lower present value compared to option B. Therefore option A should be selected.

You might be interested in
Dominik Corporation purchased a machine 5 years ago for $527,000 when it launched product M08Y. Unfortunately, this machine has
Sloan [31]

Answer:

$532,000

Explanation:

The opportunity cost is the cost of the best option rejected.

In this case the option rejected was the investment project that would have returned a total fo 532,000

Therefore, the model 240 should produce a higher profit than 532,000 to reject his project.

The 310 model would have unused capacity as it has more capacity than model 240 but the company will not need to produce as much. So it is discarted from the calculation as it has inefficiency

3 0
2 years ago
"An individual is unique and does not speak for or represent anything other than themselves." This statement is an argument agai
sammy [17]

Answer:

C: stereotypes

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Jones of San Diego sold Long of Baton Rouge a video system with a $6,000 list price. Sale terms were 2/10, n/30 FOB San Diego. J
kkurt [141]

Answer:

$4,835

Explanation:

The computation of the payment made by Long is shown below:

= Sale value of video system - discount + freight charges

where,

Discount = Sale value × discount rate

               = $6,000 × 2%

               = $1,200

The other items  values remain the same

Now put all the values to the above formula,

So, the value would be equal to

= $6,000 - $1,200 + $35

= $4,835

6 0
2 years ago
Granite State Airlines serves the route between New York and Portsmouth, NH, with a single-flight-daily 100-seat aircraft. The o
TEA [102]

Answer:

Given data: One flight with total seats = 100

Full fare passengers, cost per ticket=$150, mean=56 passengers, SD=23

Discount fare passengers, cost per ticket=$100, mean=88 passengers, SD=44

(a) Here, though there is a hint to use the CDF, since the confidence interval is not given we will make some simplying assumptions that will reduce the complexity of the question, of course keeping the question statistically correct.

this question wants us to maximize total revenue per flight (one way), we can do that by taking only full fare passengers or total revenue will be 150*100=$15,000, but since historical probability shows a mean of 56 with a standard deviation of 23, we can assume in best case scenario total full fare ticket passengers will be 56+23=79, leaving 21 tickets for discount passenger, in this case the total revenues will be 79*150+21*100=$13,950

(b) Now, the new constrained policy is giving a clear cut number of seats to each category of pasengers, 44 for discount (total revenues 44*100) and 56 for full fare (total revenues 56*150) both of which are within the probabilities given earlier (full fare mean=56, discount mean=88). Total revenues in case will be 44*100+56*150=$12,800.

(c) Gain is the difference of the excess revenues in both cases of optimal total revenues and limited seats policy or answer (a) - answer (b) = $13,950- $12,800=$1,150

(d) Realistically speaking, there is no answer for this question without a clear cut confidence interval. Another simplifying assumption we can make here is taking the mean passengers as expected bookings (can be tweaked once confidence interval or degree of significance is given). so total revenues in this case will be 44*100 from discount and 56*150 from full fare passengers. That is still similar to answer (c) due to our assumption/lack of constraints, so our optimal booking will be 54 full fare tickets and 44 discount passenger tickets. You can also take worst case scenario by subtracting SD of each passenger type from the mean or go the best case scenario in which SD of full fare will be added to the mean while the pending seats (left over from 100) will be the total to discount fare for optimal revenue collection.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Sapp Trucking's balance sheet shows a total of noncallable $45 million long-term debt with a coupon rate of 7.00% and a yield to
spin [16.1K]

Answer:

The difference between two WACC is 1.2%.

Explanation:

As we know that

WACC = Ke * Ve / (Ve + Vd (1-Tax))    +   Kd * Vd*(1-tax) / (Ve + Vd*(1-Tax))

Using the Book Value Method:

WACC =             14% *$65 / ($65m + $45m (1-40%))

                    + 6% *$45m*(1-.4) / ($65m + $45m (1-40%))

WACC = 10%  + 1.8% = 11.8%

<u>Using the market value method:</u>

Market Value of Common Stock = Common Shares * Market value per share

Market Value of Common Stock = 10 million * $22.5 per share = $225m

WACC =             14% *$225 / ($225m + $50m (1-40%))

                    + 6% *$50m*(1-.4) / ($225m + $50m (1-40%))

WACC = 12.35%  + 0.7% = 13%

The difference between two WACC is 1.2%.

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Todd, who graduated with a degree in history, has prolonged, relevant experience and significant on- the-job training as a real
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes why the predicted incremental earnings arising from a given decision are not sufficient in
    9·1 answer
  • Garrett Enterprise Garrett Enterprise is a well-known company that has been around for many years. However, Mr. Smith, its CEO,
    9·1 answer
  • Carter Industries has two divisions: the West Division and the East Division. Information relating to the divisions for the year
    14·1 answer
  • Balance sheet and income statement data indicate the following: Bonds payable, 10% $1,000,000 Preferred 5% stock, $100 par (no c
    10·1 answer
  • Bulluck Corporation makes a product with the following standard costs: Standard Quantity or Hours Standard Price or Rate Direct
    14·1 answer
  • Ehrling, Inc., manufactures metal racks for hanging clothing in retail stores. Ehrling was approached by the CEO of Carly’s Corn
    14·1 answer
  • COO, Scott Lawton, discusses Barcelona’s philosophy on allowing restaurant managers to make their own decisions. They hire and t
    7·1 answer
  • On October 31, the stockholders’ equity section of Sunland Company’s balance sheet consists of common stock $696,000 and retaine
    14·1 answer
  • Kier Company issued $700,000 in bonds on January 1, Year 1. The bonds were issued at face value and carried a 4-year term to mat
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!