This is late, but for anyone searching the answer up in the future, the answer on Edg.enuity is the last one - where the graph starts out as a horizontal line, then decreases and touches the x-axis, then increases again.
Good luck on your assignment !!
In a large population, 61% of the people are vaccinated, meaning there are 39% who are not. The problem asks for the probability that out of the 4 randomly selected people, at least one of them has been vaccinated. Therefore, we need to add all the possibilities that there could be one, two, three or four randomly selected persons who were vaccinated.
For only one person, we use P(1), same reasoning should hold for other subscripts.
P(1) = (61/100)(39/100)(39/100)(39/100) = 0.03618459
P(2) = (61/100)(61/100)(39/100)(39/100) = 0.05659641
P(3) = (61/100)(61/100)(61/100)(39/100) = 0.08852259
P(4) = (61/100)(61/100)(61/100)(61/100) = 0.13845841
Adding these probabilities, we have 0.319761. Therefore the probability of at least one person has been vaccinated out of 4 persons randomly selected is 0.32 or 32%, rounded off to the nearest hundredths.
Answer:
Null hypothesis: ∪ = $7,000
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis is a general statement that there is no relationship between two measured instances or no association among groups.
In this case, the sales of a grocery store had an average of $7,000 per day is the null hypothesis. Then the research was carried out to test for the effectiveness of the advertising campaigns in increasing sales.
Thus, this is the alternative hypothesis. The researchers wish to test against the null with regards to the involvement of the advertising campaigns.
Thus, the null hypothesis is just the average sales without the advertising campaigns which is
Null hypothesis: ∪ = $7,000
Alternative hypothesis: ∪ ≠ $7,000
