Answer:
D: compromise
Explanation:
What Wendy and Josh experienced is best described as a compromise because both changed their minds for a purpose and benefit of their marriage's future. A compromise is an agreement in an argument, when the parts decide to reduce their demands in order to reach a balance that is satisfactory for both.
The answer that would best complete the given statement above would be option B. If <span>Gerald took a break while two of his coworkers completed a task that all three of them volunteered for, this shows a lack of COOPERATIVENESS. Hope this answers your question.</span>
Answer:
As consumer phycology is the study of how or why people buy things or goods, it is a useful tool to seek what are the patterns that potential customers are likely to follow aiming to sell the bank services such as bank runs.
Explanation:
By using the influence of marketing, and external stimuli to convince possible clients to purchase, based on studies and their findings, which can help banks marketing executives to figure out how to sell the product or what is the most likely population to work on based on their preferences in order to offer different options to the costumers that can adapt to their needs.
Answer:
The correct answer is, in fact, the last one; citizens expecting to pay higher taxes for more oversight.
Explanation:
This answer comes with the understanding that negative externalities is a concept from economy especially related to the way that the economy of a country, region, or the planet itself, will be affected through the use of renewable and non-renewable resources. This concept talks about the overcosts, or benefits, that are generated through the correct use of renewable vs. non-renewable resources, and which will affect especially the future generations. As such, the fact that citizens should have to pay more taxes to increase oversight on companies so that the non-renewable resources are not depleted further, negatively impacts them and thus they would, of course, object to this.
Answer:
D. inferred causation from correlation
Explanation:
Correlation is defined as the relations between the two variables whether negative or positive. It means, changes in a variable can cause a change in other variables.
Causation is defined as the condition in which change in one variable is caused by the change in other variable.
In the given example, the researcher does not show any direct relation between scores and encyclopedia. The researcher incorrectly inferred that scores are the cause of the encyclopedia.
Hence, the correct answer is "D".
