Question:
The square of a number decreased by 3 times the number is 28 find all possible values for the number
Answer:
The possible values of number are 7 and -4
Solution:
Given that the square of a number decreased by 3 times the number is 28
To find: all possible values of number
Let "a" be the unknown number
From given information,
square of a number decreased by 3 times the number = 28


Let us solve the above quadratic equation


Using the above formula,


Thus the possible values of number are 7 and -4
Answer:
C. Different sample proportions would result each time, but for either sample size, they would be centered (have their mean) at the true population proportion.
Step-by-step explanation:
From the given information;
A political polling agency wants to take a random sample of registered voters and ask whether or not they will vote for a certain candidate.
A random sample is usually an outcome of any experiment that cannot be predicted before the result.
SO;
One plan is to select 400 voters, another plan is to select 1,600 voters
If the study were conducted repeatedly (selecting different samples of people each time);
Different sample proportions would result each time, but for either sample size, they would be centered (have their mean) at the true population proportion. This is because a sample proportion deals with random experiments that cannot be predicted in advance and they are quite known to be centered about the population proportion.
Answer:
Use the graph and table to answer the questions.
Which vehicle loses the most value each year?
Car
Which vehicle will lose all of its value first?
Car
If the truck’s rate of depreciation changes to a decrease of $1,650 each year, which vehicle will lose all of its value first?
Truck
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The interest is
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
The simple interest formula is equal to
where
I is the Final Interest Value
P is the Principal amount of money to be invested
r is the rate of interest
t is Number of Time Periods
in this problem we have
substitute in the formula above