Answer:
Hope it isnt to late but the correct answer is c. :)
Brainliest?
Answer:Teleological proof or argument
Explanation:The teleological or physico-theological argument, is the one which is based on the fact that if all premises about the natural world are true and one agrees that they are this means that the drawn conclusion is also true about the existence of God. This is an argument used mostly to observe how true premises in the natural world are and due to these evidence drawn from the evidence of the designs seen in the natural world one can not help but conclude that they must be a sovereign God who is responsible for all those designs .
The conclusion is true when all the premises are all true.
The conflict is that Singapore’s leader defended Michael Fay, a man who had done vandalism. It supports the author’s argument because he is not being accountable for committing a which is not okay. The law should be enforced fairly.
Hope this helps!
It would be this answer that is under here:
A.simile
Answer:
Through this one can infer about the father in the Watson family that he's been killed in previous year's lottery as Jack Watson, Mr. Watson's son is appointed as the head of the household.
Explanation:
'The Lottery' is a short story written by Shirley Jackson. The short story is about ritual of drawing lottery and the one whom lottery falls is killed by townspeople.
In the story, when Mrs. Watson was asked about who will draw for her family, she asserts that she will draw for her family. But the lottery is to be drawn by the male of the family only. So, Jack Watson will draw for his family. Through this incident, one can infer that Mr. Watson has been killed in the previous year's lottery. It is because, now, Jack Watson is head of the Watson family.
