<span>B)
abuses Americans endured as a colony of Great Britain. </span>
The illegal voting would have been stopped or a least greatly reduced with the implementation of proper voter registration and state IDs. Of course, with the rudimentary technology of the era, falsification of ID documents would have been relatively easier than it is today. However IDs and voter registration would have presented an additional obstacle to border ruffians.
The violence would only have been stopped by the concourse of a national guard, a state police and civil deputies from the state protecting voter, voting locations and the transportation of ballots.
Answer:
cause of suffering
Explanation:
In this case Margaery is craving other people's good or feeling envy causing her anxiety and bad dreams, we suffer because of our mistaken belief that we are a independent, separate (individualism and attachment)
Answer and Explanation:
Jacob Mchangama and Guglielmo Verdirame, in their article “The Danger of Human Rights Proliferation,” defend liberty by the motto of “less are more.”
We are asserting more and more rights without checking out the implementation of previous rights. Asserting more rights and convincing the states to add them in treaties would not lead to more excellent protection of human rights.
The proliferation of rights is more harmful to humans because human rights are not protected fully as we are expanding the number of rights in treaties.
They argued that: “If human rights were a currency, its value would be free fall……..this currency is buy cover for dictatorships ”
Rights of human language have been used to restrict rights. Freedom of religion and expression was a foundation of human rights, but states also restricted those rights in the name of human rights.
To sum up, the proliferation of human rights does not ensure that the rights of humans are being secured. States are not always concerned directly with the welfare of humans but to restrict those rights more. So the proliferation of rights is not fruitful but a dangerous thing.
The three distinct national-level "party planks" for the RNC and the DNC are American's liberalism, conservatism and individual support towards policies.
Explanation:
"Plank" is the term often given to the components of the political platform the opinions and viewpoints about individual topics, as held by a party, person, or organization. A party platform is sometimes referred to as a manifesto or a political platform.
The platform of the Republican Party of the United States is generally based on American conservatism, in contrast to the modern liberalism of the Democrats. ... In foreign policy, Republicans favor increased military spending and unilateral action.
The platform of the Democratic Party of the United States is generally based on American liberalism and American progressivism, in contrast to the conservatism of the Republican Party. ... Democrats tend to agree with the scientific consensus on climate change, and support clean energy and cap-and-trade policies.