All categories

2 years ago

Which composite function can be used to find the

Mathematics

1 answer:

eduard2 years ago

4 0

Given:

The mass function is:

$m(v)=4.5v$

where v is the volume in cubic centimeters.

The force function is:

$F(m)=800m$

To find:

The composite function can be used to find the force of the object based on its volume.

Solution:

The composite function can be used to find the force of the object based on its volume is:

$F(m(v))=F(4.5v)$ $[\because m(v)=4.5v]$

$F(m(v))=800(4.5v)$ $[\because F(m)=800m]$

$F(m(v))=3600v$

Therefore, the correct option is D.

You might be interested in

From the options below, which is typically the most expensive on a yearly basis ?

Vika [28.1K]

Was it renting a car?

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The surface area of an oil spill gets 105% larger every day, represented by the function s(x) = (1.05)x − 1. On the first day, i

ioda

The given scenario above is like a geometric sequence with r or common ratio being 1.05 and the first term being 31 square meters. The nth term of the sequence is calculated through the equation,
A15 = (A1)(r)^(n - 1)
Substituting,
A15 = (31)(1.05)^(15 - 1) = 61.3778 square meter
Therefore, the area covered by the spill after the 15th day is approximately 61.4 square meters.

6 0

2 years ago

The cafeteria director at Great Minds School wants to know what percent of the students would choose vegetarian entrees if they

Korvikt [17]

Answer:

Sort a list of the students into a random order, then ask the first 353535 students on the list.

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

a recipe calls for 3 ounces of flour for every 2 ounces of sugar. Find the constant of proportionality.

Ket [755]

3:2

for every 3 ounces of flour, you need 2 ounces of sugar

7 0

2 years ago

"Immediately after a ban on using hand-held cell phones while driving was implemented, compliance with the law was measured. A r

sergiy2304 [10]

Answer:

(a) Null Hypothesis, $H_0$ : $p_1-p_2=0$ or $p_1= p_2$

Alternate Hypothesis, $H_A$ : $p_1-p_2\neq 0$ or $p_1\neq p_2$

(b) We conclude that there is a statistical difference in these two proportions measured initially and then one year later.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that a random sample of 1,250 drivers found that 98.9% were in compliance. A year after the implementation, compliance was again measured to see if compliance was the same (or not) as previously measured.

A different random sample of 1,100 drivers found 96.9% compliance."

Let $p_1$ = proportion of drivers that were in compliance initially

$p_2$ = proportion of drivers that were in compliance one year later

(a) Null Hypothesis, $H_0$ : $p_1-p_2=0$ or $p_1= p_2$ {means that there is not any statistical difference in these two proportions measured initially and then one year later}

Alternate Hypothesis, $H_A$ : $p_1-p_2\neq 0$ or $p_1\neq p_2$ {means that there is a statistical difference in these two proportions measured initially and then one year later}

The test statistics that will be used here is Two-sample z proportion statistics;

T.S. = $\frac{(\hat p_1-\hat p_2)-(p_1-p_2)}{\sqrt{ \frac{\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1)}{n_1} + \frac{\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2)}{n_2}} }$ ~ N(0,1)

where, $\hat p_1$ = sample proportion of drivers in compliance initially = 98.9%

$\hat p_2$ = sample proportion of drivers in compliance one year later = 96.9%

$n_1$ = sample of drivers initially = 1,250

$n_2$ = sample of drivers one year later = 1,100

(b) So, the test statistics = $\frac{(0.989-0.969)-(0)}{\sqrt{ \frac{0.989(1-0.989)}{1,250} + \frac{0.969(1-0.969)}{1,100}} }$

= 3.33

Now, P-value of the test statistics is given by;

P-value = P(Z > 3.33) = 1 - P(Z $\leq$ 3.33)

= 1 - 0.99957 = 0.00043

Since in the question we are not given with the level of significance so we assume it to be 5%. Now at 5% significance level, the z table gives critical values between -1.96 and 1.96 for two-tailed test.

Since our test statistics does not lies within the range of critical values of z, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region due to which we reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that there is a statistical difference in these two proportions measured initially and then one year later.

7 0

2 years ago