This question is about the article "American flag stands for tolerance"
Answer and Explanation:
Allen shows that he believes that an individual can present better ways to show his discontent with the government instead of disrespecting the national flag by burning it, with that, we can see that he does not agree with the Supreme Court's decision to allow the burning of flags is a fair protest against the government, but quickly Allen claims that the Supreme Court is correct in allowing this, since even presenting a form of disrespect, the burning of flags is part of a peaceful protest, in addition to allowing freedom of expression in the country.
This shows that Allen's arguments are based on the country's ethical and legal standards and not on his own opinions, or on the sentimetalism he may feel for national symbols. He addresses the counterargument as a justification as to why he should not evaluate the Supreme Court's permission, but rather support it. This can be seen through the paragraph:
<em>"The American flag is a cherished symbol of our national aspirations [...] iven the widespread and deeply felt reverence for this symbol of what we perceive to be the best of our civilization, what is the harm in insisting upon a modicum of respect for it? [...] Any messages that burning the flag might convey easily can be communicated in other ways. </em>
<em>The Supreme Court was not wrong. Indeed, a decision contrary to the one reached would have been a definitive step away from our national aspirations. A commitment to the intertwined freedoms of conscience and expression is at the core of those aspirations. What most distinguishes our civilization from both its predecessors and its contemporary competitors is a belief in the sanctity of the human conscience. Each individual is to have the freedom to develop by his or her own lights, and not by the command of officialdom. That requires not just the right to be let alone, but also the right to communicate with, to learn from and test views in conversations."</em>
Answer:yoyo:is picked on and must write a speech
Both: has an accent and tries to fit in
Mother: misquotes idols and is mocked by family
Explanation:
The main idea behind area model is to crack multiplication of 2 larger numbers in sum of several easier to calculate multiplications of smaller numbers. Each multiplication of those smaller numbers is represented by part of the area in the picture.
So, we can write down number 34 as sum of 30 and 4 and number 17 as sum of 10 and 7.
Going further we can write down:
34*17=(30+4)*(10*7)=30*10+30*7+4*10+4*7=578
The following answers would be best for this question would
be:
<span>1.
</span>First of all, he asked Miss Lucas. I was so
vexed to see him stand up with her! "His pride," said Miss Lucas,
"does not offend me so much as pride often does, because there is an
excuse for it. One cannot wonder that so very fine a young man, with family,
fortune, everything in his favour, should think highly of himself. If I may so
express it, he has a right to be proud."
<span>2.
</span>"That is very true," replied
Elizabeth, "and I could easily forgive his pride, if he had not mortified
mine."
These two excerpts describe the main theme of the story
which I fact is, pride and prejudice,
it states in both characters specifically Elizabeth and Darcy are in a dilemma
with their own personal conflicts; a
character vs character type of plot.
Answer:The answer is fearful
Explanation:
In the excerpt, the girl seems scared of being separated and tells herself to pull herself together, so she may be fearful of her current situation.
