Answer:
The probability of having a child with this disease is still a 50% one
Explanation:
The parents are wrong here supposing that their next child would inherit the autosomal dominant disorder gen.This could have well happened with their first-born but it didn't, and so it may or may not happen with their second child.
In an autosomal dominant disorder, there is one mutated gen that is dominant (it is located on one of the nonsex chromosomes). A person that carries a mutated gen has a 50% probability of passing this gen to their offspring. This is regardless of the number of children they had had before.
Based on the debate rules the House of Representatives gives priority to the majority and the rules are given by their committee having a rigid floor. On the other hand, its opposite with the Senate that has a flexible floor for debate has few limitation with rules and is set to serve the minority.
C. Flute playing ☺️☺️☺️☺️
Answer:
<em>(e) top-down processing</em>
Explanation:
Since the brain is basically focused on the sensory systems higher.
Higher-level stages of cognition such as reasoning, are therefore known to be at the top of the process of feeling and perception.
But at the other hand, low-level brain structures, like those participating in sight, touch, or hearing sensory systems, are known to be at the bottom.
Top-down processing refers to how our brains use information that one or more of the sensory systems have already put into the brain.
It is a cognitive process that begins with our emotions, flowing down to functions at lower levels, such as the senses.
Answer:
Through the diverse cases represented in this collection, we model the different functions that the civic imagination performs. For the moment, we define civic imagination as the capacity to imagine alternatives to current cultural, social, political, or economic conditions; one cannot change the world without imagining what a better world might look like.
Beyond that, the civic imagination requires and is realized through the ability to imagine the process of change, to see one’s self as a civic agent capable of making change, to feel solidarity with others whose perspectives and experiences are different than one’s own, to join a larger collective with shared interests, and to bring imaginative dimensions to real world spaces and places.
Research on the civic imagination explores the political consequences of cultural representations and the cultural roots of political participation. This definition consolidates ideas from various accounts of the public imagination, the political imagination, the radical imagination, the pragmatic imagination, creative insurgency or public fantasy.
In some cases, the civic imagination is grounded in beliefs about how the system actually works, but we have a more expansive understanding stressing the capacity to imagine alternatives, even if those alternatives tap the fantastic. Too often, focusing on contemporary problems makes it impossible to see beyond immediate constraints.
This tunnel vision perpetuates the status quo, and innovative voices —especially those from the margins — are shot down before they can be heard.
