Answer:
1 yes 2 no 3 yes 4yes. (2) 1 yes 2 yes 3 yes 4 no (3) 1 yes 2 yes 3 no 4 no
Explanation:
Answer: 1. incorrect explanation construction, 2. split infinitive 3. dangling construction 4. poor parallel structure
Explanation:
1.uses is when or is where <u>matches</u> with incorrect explanation construction
2.occurs when an adverb or other word is placed between to and the verb <u>matches</u> with split infinitive
3. does not clearly connect to the word or phrase for which it was intended <u>matches</u> with dangling construction
4. uses dissimilar grammatical constructions <u>matches</u> with poor parallel structure
1. Incorrect explanation construction matches with when or where because those are the words used when it comes to incorrect explanation of some construction in the sentence. Incorrect tenses are one of the usual issues when it comes to grammar.
2. When we have in the sentences 'to' places between verb and adverb that is making a split infinitive. For example, We were told to read each book correctly.
3. Dangling construction is considering group of modifier words instead of noun or phrase in the sentence. The modifier is used to describe a noun or phrase.
4. When it comes to parallel structure, there are sentences that have the same or equivalent meaning but they are not similar grammatically and that is why it is called dissimilar construction.
Answer:
Option D.What is fallacious about the statement is that it suggests that the truth of a thing is determined by the number of people who like it.
Explanation:
The statement "fifteen million people can't be wrong" is fallacious as it implies that the truth is determined by the amount of people who believe in it, when the truth about something or someone is a fact one dimensional statement that has nothing to do with the number of people that believe in it or not. Not because 15 million people believe that something is true, changes the fact of its veracity or lack thereof.
<em>The right answer is C. He illustrates the theme of good versus evil.</em> When the President opened his speech with a description of a muckraker he gave an explanation of his perspective of what bad or evil is and related the job of journalists to revealing this evil.