Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
intercepts the x-axis at these 2 points:

⇒ 6 and 1/2 are roots ie; if you insert
or
into the equation of g(x) you will obtain a 0.

now in order for 0 to appear we should have 
now in order for 0 to appear we should have 
but
doesn't appear in any of these, but its multiple of 2 is there:

Therefore the function;

ANSWER
The correct answer is

EXPLANATION
The mapping for reflection across the x-axis is given by

Given

. We can let

we can write the ordered pair

or

as the ordered pair of the preimage of

.
The image function will have the ordered pair

or

.
That is, we negate all the y-coordinates.
Therefore

.
Question Completion:
Note: This is a Law question, not Mathematics.
Answer:
Decision:
Edwards and Davis are not personally liable for the debts of EEE, Inc.
Step-by-step explanation:
That Edwin Edwards and Karen Davis owned EEE Inc. does not force them to be personally liable for the debts of EEE Inc. EEE Inc. is a separate legal entity. There is the legal separation of ownership and the liabilities of Edwards and Davis are limited to the capital they contributed or undertook to contribute to the corporation. The corporate veil is only lifted when it is ascertained that EEE Inc. was not run as a legal entity separate from the owners. We can also conclude that there is no evidence of abuse of the corporate form of EEE Inc. with comingling of assets or for the purpose of promoting fraud or injustice or evasion of tort or contractual responsibility on the part of Edwards and Davis. Therefore, Edwin Edwards and Karen Davis are not personally liable for the debts of EEE Inc. as claimed by Reid Ellis.