Answer:
Conclusion
There is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean of the home prices from Ascension parish is higher than the EBR mean
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The population mean for EBR is 
The sample mean for Ascension parish is 
The p-value is 
The level of significance is 
The null hypothesis is 
The alternative hypothesis is 
Here
is the population mean for Ascension parish
From the data given values we see that

So we fail to reject the null hypothesis
So we conclude that there is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean of the home prices from Ascension parish is higher than the EBR mean
Answer:
Option (a) is correct.
The system of equation becomes

Step-by-step explanation:
Given : Equation 
We have to construct a system of equations that can be used to find the roots of the equation 
Consider the given equation 
To construct a system of equation put both sides of the given equation equal to a same variable.
Let the variable be "y", Then the equation 
becomes,
Thus, The system of equation becomes

Option (a) is correct.
Answer:
A and E
Step-by-step explanation:
Death Valley and Alaska
73+42=115
134+15=149
A.
Multiply the number of days, x by 50 per day to get 50x.
Next multiply the number of miles driven to the amount she gets per mile: 0.60 x 200 = $120
Now add both together to equal the total of 1620.
The equation becomes: 50x +120 = 1620
B.
50x +120 = 1620
Step 1: subtract 120 from both sides ( subtraction property of equality):
50x = 1500
Step 2: Divide both sides by 50 ( division property of equality):
x = 1500 / 50
x = 30
C.
The trip lasted 30 days.