Answer:
21% of the animals are female
Step-by-step explanation:
In total:
There are 40 + 60 = 100 animals.
Female animals.
40 dogs. Of those, 15% are female. So 0.15*40 = 6.
60 cats. Of those, 25% are female. So 0.25*60 = 15.
21 female animals.
21/100 = 0.21 = 21%
21% of the animals are female
Where does that StartFraction ... mess come from? -- I've seen it in other questions.
Comparing that to the general quadratic formula
we see b=-10 (agreeing in both places) a=7 (two places), c=-2
Answer: 7x² - 10x - 2 = 0
The WRONG Answer is 3 percent
Step-by-step explanation:
I’m from FLVS
Answer:
according to the equation it is 158.330917...
Step-by-step explanation:
put w as 64 and solve for t
Answer:
Denny's chowder wont have because the winner was picked anonymously without due fact and figure. The judges would have attached a contestant tag to the chowders prepared for the annual clam festival. The winner was declared without any reason to back up that indeed the chowder had been from Denny's chowder
B..1, Experiments are often blinded this way because of the bias of the individual measuring the experiment
2. Also lack of facts and figures to justify results
Step-by-step explanation:
Do you think that Denny’s chowder would have won the contest if the judging had not been "blind?" Explain.
Although this was not an experiment, your answer to Part (a) helps to explain why those measuring the response in an experiment are often blinded
Denny's chowder wont have because the winner was picked anonymously without due fact and figure. The judges would have attached a contestant tag to the chowders prepared for the annual clam festival. The winner was declared without any reason to back up that indeed the chowder had been from Denny's chowder.
Using your answer in Part (a), explain why experiments are often blinded in this way
1.. Experiments are often blinded this way because of the bias of the individual measuring the experiment
2. Also lack of facts and figures to justify results
