All of the countries<span> are represented among the climbing parties. Many different countries with different cultures were there to experience the same life and death phenomena that troubled the author in writing this piece. The countries enumerated are among those who have experienced these phenomena and are considered as climbing parties.</span>
Answer:
C. factor analysis.
Explanation:
Factor analysis: The term factor analysis is referred to as a statistical method that is used to demonstrate the variability of the correlated, observed variables concerning the possibly unobserved variables of lower number knows as factors.
Factor analysis examines joint variations concerning latent unobserved variables.
In other words, factor analysis is used to identify questions in any survey that reflect abstract variables or broader dimensions known as factors that are independent of one another.
Answer:
Explanation:
<u>One of the examples of behavior that would be considered deviant in one society and not in the other is the eating of certain animals. The examples are:</u>
- Some societies in India consider the cow a sacred animal and never would consume beef.
- Muslim societies do not eat pork meat.
- Insects are considered a tasty snack in many countries, including Thailand, while it would be considered gross by many people from the west.
- While some of the western European countries (like France and Belgium) have specialized butcher shops and restaurants for horse meat, eating it would most likely be considered taboo in the US or UK.
- The most radical example is the eating of dogs, which occurs in some Asian countries, most notably China. There is even a whole festival for dog meat consumption in Yulin, and every year there are protests across the globe because of this event. Slaughtering dogs for meat consumption is prohibited in the US and plenty of other countries.
<u>With all of this, we can conclude that some food consumption can be seen as deviant in some parts of the world, while in others it is a normal occurrence and part of the every-day diet.</u>
Despite various taboos and laws, what we have to understand is that our connection to the animals is culturally constructed. The fact that people of the US feel closer to dogs, cats, and horses, but not to sheep and pigs, is not the fact supported by nature. There is nothing in nature itself and the nutrition of horses, insects, and various other species that prevents us to eat them. These deviances surrounding different meats are all culturally constructed. <u>This does not mean they are less real or that we should eat all the animals, just that we have to realize that our ways are no naturally more or less right than someone else’s.</u>
Answer:
The first thing to do before searching for the answer is understanding the question so that you know what to search for and what to type in the search bar! So the search strategy is to first understand the question.
Answer:
The correct answer is A. The Articles of Confederation did not grant Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce.
Explanation:
The Articles of Confederation were the first government document, or Constitution, of the United States. They were written in the summer of 1776 and taken over by the Second Continental Congress on November 15, 1777, after one year of debate. In practice, they served as the de facto system of government used by Congress until the Articles final ratification on March 1, 1781.
The Articles of Confederation laid down the rules of operation of the United States. The Confederacy could wage war, negotiate diplomatic agreements, deal with the problems of Western territories, spend money and borrow within and outside the States. On the other hand, the impossibility to determine taxes and regulate interstate commerce was a major shortcoming. The second weak point was the principle of one state, one vote. Larger states were expected to contribute more but had only one vote.
Originally, the intention was only a weak central government, which was supposed to rule, especially in an emergency. But the end of the war and the new priorities that emerged clearly showed many of the shortcomings of the Articles. They were replaced by the much stronger Constitution after ratification on June 21, 1788.
