Answer:
Both laws have striking similarities, but they also exhibit other differences as explained in the following
Explanation:
Both laws have striking similarities, but there are also vast differences. And the differences show how one is far superior to the other.
In the similarities both are sets of laws designed to help society function in ways so that it could prosper, and these laws contained particular civil rights.
They both share in the protection of marriage, family, property damage, injury, murder, robbery, theft, kidnapping and even in commerce, so they both act as stabilizers of society.
Here are some differences between both.
The source of the Book of the hebrew Covenant is God; the source for the Hammurabi laws is Hammurabi the Babylonian king in ancient Mesopotamia. The hebrew Covenant protects the disenfranchised members of society, regardless of their place or rank in society, while the Code of Hammurabi is interested only in the free men class and gives special protection to the middle and higher social classes of Babylon. Another difference was the fact that God was interested in creating a kingdom of priests, a holy nation in the hebrew law, but Hammurabi’s motivation is for prosperity and longevity on the throne.
The Europeans in the Caribbean felt the need to bring in enslaved Africans as laborers because the native American Indian workers had become physically weak due to diseases and the Caribbean plantations were in requirement of stronger labor force. The Africans by birth were very strong and they as slaves would perfectly suit the needs of the Caribbean plantations.
They did not like his association with the administration’s Vietnam policy. is why <span>did some Democrats oppose Hubert Humphrey in his 1968 race for the presidency.</span>
The answer is A. They were actually never found, they just....disappeared. There was a theory behind their disappearance as well.
The Inca used the slash and burn technique to cultivate agriculture. This method of agriculture also known as fire-fallow cultivation that involves cutting and burning of plants in a woodland to create a field called a swidden.
