Sample Answer:
The phrase "wet he hoof" means to get his foot wet. The author describes the setting with Bruh Deer at the edge of the river trying to cross. He sees Bruh Alligator, so he does not have a chance to get in the water, not even with one foot. These context clues show that the words probably mean "get his foot wet."
Answer:
<h2>QT = 21</h2><h2>SV = 41</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
From the diagram, it can be seen that TR is parallel to RV. This means that TR = RV. Given TR = 17 and RV = 3x+2
3x+2 = 17
3x = 17-2
3x = 15
x = 5
RV = 3(5)+2 = 17
QV = 4x+1 = 4(5)+1
QV = 21
Using Pythagoras theorem on ΔQRV to get RQ
QV² = QR²+RV²
21² = QR²+17²
QR² = 21²-17²
QR = 12.33
Using Pythagoras theorem on ΔQRT to get QT
From ΔQRT,
QT² = QR²+TR²
QT² = 12.33²+17²
QR² = 152.0289+289
QT² = 441.0289
QT =21
Since TS = 9(5)-4 = 41
Using Pythagoras theorem on ΔTRS
From ΔTRS,
TS² = RS²+TR²
41² = RS²+17²
RS² = 41²-17²
RS² = 1392
RS = 37.31
Similarly Using Pythagoras theorem on ΔRSV
From ΔRSV,
SV² = RV²+RS²
SV² = 17²+37.31²
SV² = 1681.0361
SV = 41
The best measure of center tendency for this set of data would be the median. It is the best measurement because the data set has an outlier. The outlier is the 30. So to find the median we first order the data set and then find out if the set is an even or odd set. This set is even so we just chose the middle number. If the set was even, we would add the two center number and divide them by 2.
3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 30
The center tendency = 4
We know that
180 degrees is equal to pi radians
so
for 30 degrees
180°--------> pi radians
30°--------> x
x=30*pi/180------> x=pi/6 radians
for 60 degrees
180°--------> pi radians
60°--------> x
x=60*pi/180------> x=pi/3 radians
for 90 degrees
180°--------> pi radians
90°--------> x
x=90*pi/180------> x=pi/2 radians
the answer is the option c
pi/6,pi/3,pi/2
Answer:
0.6421
Step-by-step explanation:
In this case we have 3 trials and we have 2 options for each one. The driver has or hasn't been under alcohol influence. The probability that the driver has is 0.29 and the probabiility that the driver hasn't is 1 - 0.29 = 0.71
each trial is independent because we are assuming that the population of drivers in between 21 and 25 years old is very big.
The probability that one of them was under alcohol influence can be found by finding the probability that non of them was under alcohol influence because:
1 = p(x = 0) + p(x ≥ 1)
p(x ≥ 1) = 1 - p(0)
The probability that none of them was under alcohol influence is going to be:
0.71×0.71×0.71 = 0.3579
The probability of finding at least one driver that has been under alcohol influence is:
0.6421
