Answer:
a. project A; because its NPV is about $335 more than the NPV of project B.
Explanation:
As in the question it is mentioned that the required rate of return for project A and project B is 11.25% and 10.75% respectively.
Here we have to determined the net present value for both projects having different required rate of return
So based on the net present value the first option is correct as the project A is more than the project B
Therefore the first option should be accepted
Answer:The cash flow effect of Fey Enterprises’ restructuring during fiscal 2016 is: $9,900,000
Explanation:
The total restructuring charge accrued = $16.2 million this is so as asset write-downs are not accrued. This in term states that there is no credit to a liability account for write-downs, the assets are credited (reduced).
Therefore,
The company paid the amount = $12,600,000 - $2,700,000 = $9,900,000 during cash during fiscal 2016.
<u><em>Therefore, the correct option is (d)</em></u>
Original Source Material
Student Version
Merck, in fact, epitomizes the ideological nature--the pragmatic idealism--of highly visionary companies. Our research showed that a fundamental element in the "ticking clock" of a visionary company is a core ideology--core values and a sense of purpose beyond just making money--that guides and inspires people throughout the organization and remains relatively fixed for long periods of time.
References:
Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (2002). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York, NY: Harper Paperbacks.
Several factors can contribute to long-term organizational success. One is the establishment of a core ideology that Collins and Porras (2002) describe as "core values and sense of purpose beyond just making money" (p. 48). Also, the importance of a visionary leader that guides and inspires people throughout the organization and remains relatively fixed for long periods of time is hard to over emphasize.
References:
Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (2002). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York, NY: Harper Paperbacks.
Which of the following is true for the Student Version above?
Word-for-Word plagiarism
Paraphrasing plagiarism
This is not plagiarism
This is not plagiarism.
Answer: Option 3.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Plagiarism in very simple words is the copying of the content of the document that has been written by some one else in to your own document. During this copying the due acknowledgement is also not given to the document from which it has been taken.
The document that has been talked about in the question above is not an example of plagiarism. The proof for this is the due acknowledgement given to the references from whose document the content has been taken into the document.
Answer: a) Maude likely can successfully sue her employer for violation of a Whistleblower Protection Law.
Explanation:
Whistleblowers are people who call attention to illegal activities in their workplace which means that Maude qualifies as one.
In order to encourage people to speak out and call attention to illegal activities in the workplace, there are several laws at both Federal and State level that are aimed at protecting employees should they report said illegal activities.
This is why it is likely that Maude can sue her employer for violation of such laws but she must do so speedily to ensure that she can be helped as some of these laws tend to be limited.
