Answer: B. Anca
Explanation:
From the information provided in the question, we should note that Anca purchasing the tickets will lead to a more economically efficient outcome.
From the information given, we can see that Anca is willing to pay $1250 while Sean wants to pay $705. Therefrom Anca purchasing the tickets leads to a better efficiency.
We can also infer that if Anca pays $1,250, a consumer surplus of $550 is gotten while Sean would get a consumer surplus of only $5.
Therefore, the correct option is B.
To combat this stereotyping the HR director has decided to<u> "adopt more transparent practices".</u>
Nowadays, pay transparency is an interesting issue among HR and compensation experts. Pay transparency doesn't need to be a win or bust approach where everybody knows every other person's compensation. Or maybe, we trust transparency is a range. It's how much an association will examine its general pay rehearses. Pay transparency is significantly something other than the dollar sum a business pays every worker. It's additionally being more open about how pay was resolved and giving a clarification of the organization's compensation grades.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Carleton works outside to survey and ok future building sites while Judd is responsible for the repair and replacement of future work, something that while a carpenter usually does this when the building is first made, it is stated he does this on pre-existing buildings, making his career maintenance.
Answer:
Thus, effective purchasing Implies buying the right items needed for operations at the right/fair price so as to reduce the total cost of operations, which invariably leads to more Profit since there's reductions in costs.