Something is plagiarism if one takes material from another source and uses it without pointing toward that source, thus making it appear that it is originally written.
1. No, this is not plagiarism since she herself is the original writer, thus she is not stealing content from anybody else.<span>
2. According to Casey Berry of Sciences Ltd., "Only 6% of students wash their hands after class." This first choice is not plagiarism, since the student has cited the researcher Casey Berry, and has enclosed the directly copied statement in quotation marks. In contrast, the second choice mentions "a recent study" without any direct mention of who did the study, and it copies the conclusion verbatim without using quotation marks.
3. This is not plagiarism, since she places a hyperlink to the source, thus acknowledging that what she has written is not her own original material. However, this is considered bad practice, to simply link to a source without describing what it has done or which parts specifically you have taken from it. You would not probably be sued in court for plagiarism, but it is still advisable to describe what the source has done.
4. No, this is not plagiarism. He has used quotation marks for direct quotes. The paraphrased information does not need quotation marks. Hyperlinks and attributions have been provided for each, so there are no issues with this kind of writing.
5. Yes, this is plagiarism. The BlogMutt writer got information from another post (which may or may not have been original material, we do not know), and did not attribute that post. Furthermore, this write-up is for a customer, not merely for discussion in forums, so pretending that the information on the post is his own is not only plagiarism, but it is also business dishonesty as he is stealing someone's work and selling it to a customer as his own.</span>
Answer:
The third passage best sums of the speech
Explanation:
It calls attention to similarities between the seasons.
Answer: Option 4.
Explanation:
Parallelism examples are found in literary works as well as in ordinary conversations. This method adds balance and rhythm to sentences, giving ideas a smoother flow and thus persuasiveness, because of the repetition it employs.
It is used to help organize ideas, but also to make the ideas memorable. When a sentence is unintentionally cluttered, unbalanced, or lengthy, this is called faulty parallelism and should be avoided. The usual way to join parallel structures is with the use of coordinating conjunctions such as "and".
Our team has won more games than has any other team. - Sounds more illogical
Answer:
In the TED talk Malcolm Gladwell explain the impact Howard Moskowitz had acknowledged about the world. As discussed in the video, Howard Moskowitz is a short round man that is in his60’s. He wears big huge glasses and has thinning grey hair on top of his head. Who graduated with his doctorate from Harvard and took on the role as a psychophysicist. Psychophysics, is study of quantitative relations between psychological events and physical events or, more specifically, between sensations and the stimuli that produce them. After graduation he set up little consulting shop in White Plains, New York, very first client was Pepsi. And Pepsi came to Howard asked him for his help. Pepsi wanted to figure out how much aspartame they should put in to each can of Diet Pepsi. With that being said, Howard to on the job and after many experiment and collected data. Howard begun to realize that the data wasn’t making sense. However, after dreaming up work for Nescafe he begun to realize the problem wasn’t the data it was because they were asking the wrong question. Instead of looking for the perfect Pepsi, we should be looking for the perfect Pepsis. Even though people didn’t understand his madness. They had soon understood that that Howard realization revolution was the most brilliant breakthrough in all of food science. Because Of that one thought he was able to fundamentally change the way food industry view their product and how to connect with their customer in pursuing their happiness. Creating the universals understanding of variety.However, Campbell’s Soup is where you truly understand Howard Moskowitz revolutionary impact he had. Its where he made his reputation. Prego is one of Campbell’s brands and in the early 80s they were struggling next to Ragú, which was the dominant spaghetti during that time. They came to Howard and said, “fix us”. Which resulted in Prego - completely reformulated their spaghetti sauce, by coming out with a line of extra chunky that immediately and completely took over the spaghetti sauce business in this country.
Explanation:
I hope that helps. I don't know if it is right or wrong, but good luck :)
