Doll's House best connect to the views of society in the late 1800's through the introduction of modernism.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Ibsen's Doll's House is one of the plays that is still appreciated for its content and the realism of the 1800's. Doll's House best connect to the views of society in the late 1800's through the introduction of modernism. Nora and Helmer depicted the reality of the society of that period.
Women of that period decided to break free from their household boundaries and from the control of their husbands. Nora leaving the house in the end speaks the reality of that time, were women were leaving their houses and standing at their own feet. They started educating themselves and revolve themselves to stand in the society without the help of anyone.
I would go with c.Good luck !
Riker wrote the poem "Spanish Dancer" in rhyme but also in German. When it was translated, it lost the rhyming words. So the correct answer is D.
Answer: It features a reference to a supernatural being.
In this excerpt, we encounter a myth from the Maasai. This myth states that there is a supernatural being called Enkai, who is a sky god. Enkai has no gender. It can act kindly by giving the people rain, or cruelly by making the earth dry up. The presence of a supernatural being who can control the destiny of humans makes this a good example of a myth.
A foil is the near complete opposite of the main character (whichever character they want you to find a foil for).
Rainsford and Whitney were good hunting friends with numerous similar interests. They could not be foils because of how close in similarity they were. Even when they disagreed on how animals felt about being hunted, Whitney seemed open to and intrigued by Rainsford's points and way of thinking.
Ivan is a near irrelevant character, being a mere Cossack who follows whatever General Zaroff says. He is mindless and has almost zero traits to even compare to Rainsford, let alone any traits aside from a mindless follower to begin with.
The answer would be General Zaroff. This is almost like the cliche protagonist vs antagonist foil. Both of them are hunters, but different kinds. Zaroff got bored with animals and wanted to hunt human people instead, whereas Rainsford had enjoyed the thrill of an animal hunt and thinks that the hunting of people is murder. Zaroff is more heartless and cold, a killer, if you will. Rainsford seems to think highly of actual people, and had no interest in playing Zaroff's game.
