Your question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
Anne Bradstreet was a Puritan who lived during Colonial America. Her poems reflected elements of her personal life. In this poem, her house has burned and she has lost all of her possessions. Read the last two stanzas (lines 43-54). How do these lines reflect aspects of her Puritan beliefs?
A) She relies on her own work ethic to build her another house.
B) She is so distraught that she wishes she had died in the fire.
C) She knows that her permanent home is waiting for her in heaven.
D) She prays for an architect from town to come build her a new home.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter C) She knows that her permanent home is waiting for her in heaven.
Explanation:
In the last two stanzas of her poem "Verses upon the Burning of our House, July 10th, 1666", author Anne Bradstreet calls God the mighty Architect. She does not seem to repine over the house she has lost to the fire. Quite the contrary, she is faithful to the belief that her permanent home is the spiritual one waiting for her in heaven. That is a reflection of her Puritan beliefs. This world is nothing but a passageway for the next and most important one. She does not need to suffer over material losses because what truly matters is the spirit. As she says in the last line of the poem, "My hope and treasure lies above."
Answer:Animals are gently guided by nature, and All of nature is connected in a beautiful way
Explanation:this is the right one because i did it and got it right
Sample Response: The main conflict will most likely be between the animals and the humans. Several ideas in the text support this prediction. First, the animals explain that they live in miserable conditions, and that the humans steal their labor. Then, they state that man is the enemy. Finally, they say that hunger and overwork will disappear if humans are removed from their lives. It seems likely that the animals on the farm will rebel against their human owners.
I'm kind of confused as to what is being asked.... but this is my best answer.
SOCIAL Prejudice, (maybe legal if we talk about the consequence to his actions)
why it cant be the others--->
racial ---- they say nothing about race here.
(MAYBE) legal----- from the passage, we can say that the guy is richhhhh, and he might be able to wave off the consequences of his murder. but then again you only analyze this passage so, probably not
environmental---- they don't mention the environment....
THE REASON WHY IT SHOULD BE SOCIAL- their social standings in this situation
-diamond ring (if thats what they mean by diamond ring finger, it could mean something else as well) only the rich can afford, a cane too
- hotel society gathering... (rich)
-poor Hattie Carroll could be literal as well.
Correct answer choice is :
<h2>B) Ironic</h2><h2 /><h2>Explanation:</h2><h2 />
Dr. Heidegger's Experiment is a brief story by American author Nathaniel Hawthorne, about a doctor who pretends to have been sent water from the Fountain of Youth.Dr. Heidegger's Experiment is rooted in a fairly realistic view of human nature. The story contends that people are, for the most part, fools. They don't learn from their errors, they're usually petty, and we can't require anyone to change for the better.