The error they are making is called 'overgeneralization'.
Answer: An external locus of control
Explanation: Individuals with external locus of control are simply those who believe or are of the opinion that external factors Plays a huge role in the outcome of their endeavor and as such success or failure hinges more on external constraint beyond their control rather than their own personal ability. This is evident in Aaron's comment after had succeeded in his Anatomy and physiology exams obtaining A after having studied hard. However, he still believed that luck, an external factor played an important role in his success. Other external factors may include bias, circumstance and so on.
Answer:
Continuance commitment
Explanation:
Organizational commitment
This is simply known as is need or desire of an employee to want to remain a member of the organization. Organizational commitment acts on whether an employee stays a member of the organization that is retained or leaves to pursue another job that is turns over.
The three types of organizational commitment. They include:
1. Continuance commitment
2. Normative commitment
3. Affective commitment
Continuance commitment
This is simply defined as one's (employee) desire to remain a member of an organization due to the fact that one is aware of the costs associated with leaving that particular job. This type of commitment is said to exists when there is a profit associated with staying and a cost associated with leaving an organization. It simply involves staying with an organization because you need to.
Answer:
Explanation:
<u>One of the examples of behavior that would be considered deviant in one society and not in the other is the eating of certain animals. The examples are:</u>
- Some societies in India consider the cow a sacred animal and never would consume beef.
- Muslim societies do not eat pork meat.
- Insects are considered a tasty snack in many countries, including Thailand, while it would be considered gross by many people from the west.
- While some of the western European countries (like France and Belgium) have specialized butcher shops and restaurants for horse meat, eating it would most likely be considered taboo in the US or UK.
- The most radical example is the eating of dogs, which occurs in some Asian countries, most notably China. There is even a whole festival for dog meat consumption in Yulin, and every year there are protests across the globe because of this event. Slaughtering dogs for meat consumption is prohibited in the US and plenty of other countries.
<u>With all of this, we can conclude that some food consumption can be seen as deviant in some parts of the world, while in others it is a normal occurrence and part of the every-day diet.</u>
Despite various taboos and laws, what we have to understand is that our connection to the animals is culturally constructed. The fact that people of the US feel closer to dogs, cats, and horses, but not to sheep and pigs, is not the fact supported by nature. There is nothing in nature itself and the nutrition of horses, insects, and various other species that prevents us to eat them. These deviances surrounding different meats are all culturally constructed. <u>This does not mean they are less real or that we should eat all the animals, just that we have to realize that our ways are no naturally more or less right than someone else’s.</u>
