Is this a question?
I hope this helped! If so, please mark brainliest!
Answer and Explanation:
The chest looked ancient - I would have guessed some good hundred years. There wasn't much to it; no golden adornments of any kind. Its wood was dark, damp, and splintered, as if it were telling the story of every storm, every high tide, every humid summer it had survived. There was a sort of metal strap around it, with rusty little hollowed handles that closed side by side to allow the padlock to lock. The padlock itself was rusty and rustic, with a huge black emptiness in its center waiting for a key - the majestic old key I now had in my hands. I felt as if electricity were running through my veins instead of my own red blood, as if my brain could no longer contain any thoughts other than the curious urge to open that chest. I did it carefully, afraid to hurt my hands with the rusty iron and the splinters. Inside, there was nothing but a necklace. My heart thumped strongly, I would have heard its beating in a vacuum. I had found it, the golden necklace everyone believed to be a myth. I held it in my hands, triumphantly.
Note: Your question does not give much context about how or why those objects would be found. So I just made up some sort of story around it. Feel free to change anything!
<span>Bacon lists Cupid’s attributes in order to compare them to the features of the atom.
Just like Cupid, atoms too are primary seeds that make up the world, and just like Cupid, they are naked, because they are not merged into a compound, but rather remain their "innocent" selves. He doesn't use this comparison to prove that Cupid is real (nobody can do that), or to prove he is a child (he is often portrayed as one), or to disprove the existence of atoms (it has been proven already they exist).
</span>
Answer:
Genetic modification has existed for years.
Many common foods have been genetically modified in some way.
Genetically modified foods are held to the same safety standards as conventional foods.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
Yes, all three make up the triangle of persuasion.
Examples can be:
Ethos~ An advertisement on an alternative medicine persuaded to be efficient by the credibility of scientists in lab coats.
Pathos~ A commercial asking for donations to help abused animals to appeal to the emotional view.
Logos~ A statistic in a magazine about rates of how people with more shoes are more happy, suggesting you should buy shows for this reason.
Although all examples have bad motives for persuading, ways to avoid being tricked in these examples are:
-In ethos ex., people with lab coats aren't necessarily credible, look them up and see if they are legitimate, and if they are, look at what they are saying and if it is even relatable to the subject.
-In pathos ex., how did this commercial even get the money to be advertised? If they have money, they should use it to support the animals. Think before donating money to a program like this, because most of time, more than half the money you donate goes to them then the ones in need.
-In logos, the statistics are correct, but if you are depressed, it doesn't mean you should buy more shoes. There is a hidden variable in their data
I hope this helps?
