Answer:
Qualifications, good behavior/track record, experience, judicial philosophy, no conflict of interest
Explanation:
The constitution of the United States specifically singles out good behavior as a prerequisite for appointed for the role of judge of the Supreme court(federal level), remaining silent on issues such as qualifications, experience, philosophy, and any potential conflict of interest. According to Article 3, Section 1 of the US constitution, the individual need be of "good behavior" as in acceptable character to be in office.
I believe the answer is: <span>High in consequence and high in probability.
An outcome is considered as high in consequence is it posses high level of danger for the actor (such as death, financial bankruptcy,fatal injuries) , and an outcome is considered as high in probability if the chance of its occurring is significantly high.</span>
Approximately all States take in emotional or psychological mistreatment
as slice of their descriptions of abuse or abandonment. This is frequently
defined as injury to the psychological capacity or emotional stability of the
child, as evidenced by an observable or substantial change in behavior,
emotional response, or cognition or
as showed by concern, depression,
withdrawal, or violent behavior.
The answer is: the iron law of oligarchy
the iron law of oligarchy refers to the theory that all forms of organization would eventually filled with people that eventually taking advantage of their position in the organization in order to take as much benefit as they can, no matter how democratic that organization started off with.
This theory is based on basic human nature that tend to have tendencies to never develop a sense of satisfaction and had overwhelming desire to keep acquiring more in our life. We can see this in Vic's attitude that start to leverage his position to gain favor.
