Answer:
An observational study of an association between two variables.
Explanation:
In the given scenario, it is an observational study of an association between two variables. The variables being :
- Explanatory variable (independant variable / predictor variable) may explain or influence changes in a response variable.
- Response variable (dependant variable) measures an outcome of a study.
Observational study observes individuals and records variables but doesn't attempt to influence the response (does not impose a treatment). It allows the researcher to directly observed the behavior of inteest rather than rely on the subject's self-descriptions (Survey) thus allowing the researcher to study the subject in its natural environment, thus removing the potentiallybased effect of the unnatural laboratory setting on the subject's performance.
I believe the answer is: <span>slippery slope Fallacy
</span><span>slippery slope Fallacy Refers to an argument that sounded correct intially, but often exaggerated to make a minor event appear to be causing consequences that way bigger than it actually does. </span>We can is this in Jill exaggeration on what the human cloning would do without providing a slightest evidence on her conclusion.
Answer:
The School Board says Libby and her friends released an unauthorized publication on school grounds. Their defense should be "the whole program (including content, publication, and location) was discussed with and approved by her teacher (her primary interface with the school hierarchy)" If there is any fault to be found, it falls on a) the Teacher's head since she didn't advise Libby to seek permission from any other members in the hierarchy, and/or b) the hierarchy itself for not conveying the need to seek permission for thios type of program. I'm sure other "publications" (artwork, themes, book reports, biographies, and so on) can be shown to set precedent for publications on school grounds without formal permissions.
Re First Ammendment Rights: The description of documents in the ammendment clearly parallels the content of the newspaper. Per referenced source": Criticism of the government and advocacy of unpopular ideas that people may find distasteful or against public policy are almost always permitted. Within these limited areas, other limitations on free speech balance rights to free speech and other rights, such as rights for authors and inventors over their works and discoveries (copyright and patent), protection from imminent or potential violence against particular persons (restrictions on fighting words), or the use of untruths to harm others (slander). Distinctions are often made between speech and other acts which may have symbolic significance.
Despite the exceptions, the legal protections of the First Amendment are some of the broadest of any industrialized nation, and remain a critical, and occasionally controversial, component of American jurisprudence.
Explanation:
<em>Answer:</em>
<em>main effect of eating</em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>Hypothesis: </em><em>In research methods, the hypothesis is described as a "proposed explanation" for a specific phenomenon. It requires the scientific method to prove it or test it. Different scientists, researcher, or experimenter generally base their hypotheses on the former observations that can't be explained satisfactorily with already available theories.</em>
<em>It is referred</em><em> to as an explanation that a researcher tests or measures via experimentation or study.</em>
<em>As per the question, the researcher expects to observe the main effect of eating.</em>
