<span>When constructing an argument, one thing
writers do is concede a point. This
technique demonstrates to readers that the author considered both sides of the
argument and that the argument being presented is not entirely one sided. Thus, what the author is doing here is conceding
the point that tablets can be cost prohibitive.
However, when conceding a point, it is best to immediately follow it up
with a rebuttal. In this particular
instance, what the author should do is include information on cost and perhaps
try to undermine the point being conceded by mentioning the cost of text books,
which can, too, be quite pricey and cannot be updated as easily as information
on a tablet. </span>
When we say narrative structure, this means that it is narrating something that happened in a sequence of events. Therefore, the answer for this would be option D. The way in which James Baldwin used a narrative structure is in <span>the essay that tells a story about the narrators relationship with his father. Hope this answer helps.
</span>
1) the correct answer is B True love is inexplicable and boundless.
2) the correct answer is C “I love you without knowing how, or when, or from where” (Line 9).
3) the correct answer is A urgent and passionate.
4) At the beginning of the poem, he says why he does not love her. He doesn't love her as if she was a salt-rose, topaz, or carnation, but he loves her as if she was a plant that does not bloom. This means that he does not love her superficially, but he loves her deeply for who she is on the inside.
Flowers are beautiful things that everyone admires, but no one would admire a flower that doesn’t bloom because they could not see the beauty that it contains.
1. <span>Cassius’s plan that he has to mislead Brutus to make it happen meant that Cassius understands that Brutus will never act dishonorably.
2. </span><span>Brutus readily believes what Cassius says because Brutus believes that a man should be noble over everything else.
3. Brutus refused to kill him because he knows that if he does, the people in Rome will turn against him.
Thank you for posting your question. I hope that this answer helped you. Let me know if you need more help.
</span>
Answer: We are not initially responsible for the capture of slaves taken as a result of war.
The first statement disputes the claim because it argues that captives from wars might still be taken in an unjust way. The third statement similarly disputes the claim by arguing that not all captives are victims of combat, but some were kidnapped despite their peaceful existence. Finally, the last statement argues that even if captives were taken lawfully in those wars, it would still be a great kindness to help them.
The second statement, on the other hand, supports the claim. It argues that the capture of slaves is not our responsibility, as they have been lawfully taken during war.
