Answer:
Jessica is demonstrating post-conventional level of moral development.
Explanation:
Post-conventional is the highest stage of morality defined by Kohlberg. At this stage, individuals have their own set of morals and ethics. There is no external force which controls their sense of morality. This is because experiences and observations make the individuals realize that certain rules are unfair and unjust so they come up with their own ideas and beliefs. However, sometimes their morals and ethics may breed conflicts and disagreements as not everyone agrees to it.
I believe the answer is: physiological; physiological
physiological dependence refers to a dependence that is caused from the reducing existence of the things that we're used to. Tolerance is a form reduction of desire fulfilment in order to give the chance to others to fulfill their desire. Withdrawal is form of substance reduction that usually exist in our body.
The correct answer is A) priming.
Daniel is headed out on a blind date. The friend who set him up told him that his date was valedictorian of her graduating class. As Daniel is talking with his date, he begins to question his own understanding of math when she tells him that 1+1=3. His perception that she is right, even though it goes against what he understands, is due to priming.
This phenomenon happens when one external stimulus is able to influence your perception of reality and makes you believe something although you cannot understand it, That is why Daniel started to question his own understanding of math when her date told him that 1+1=3. The effect of priming on a person can be circumstantial, momentary, or last for a while. According to scholars, priming can present itself in the following modalities: affective, negative, positive, and perceptual, and has a direct impact on the receiver.
The engineering notation follows the metric system and the scientific notation does not, I hope this helped. Enjoy The Rest Of Your Day!
I think that Nearly every character is hiding some kind of secret, yet they are still portrayed as essentially good people. Does this mean that Steinbeck is advocating mistruths, or that he realizes people are imperfect and it is therefore better to judge motive than action but i'm not sure.
