All categories

2 years ago

Marketing intermediaries, such as fedex, add value to the distribution of goods and services. this added value is known as

2 answers:

4 0

Marketing intermediaries, such as FedEx, add value to the distribution of goods and services. this added value is known as $\fbox{Utility}$ .

Further Explanation:

The market intermediaries provide better services in the distribution. They have their, distribution network to carry out the activities. They can also handle the large volume at a low cost than a company. The use of intermediaries by the company helps them to decreases their cost of distribution. The company can also focus on core areas like production, and it also helps to improve their productivity.

It also increases the utility for the consumer by providing Shipping insurance, order tracking facility, door to door service, guaranteed time of delivery.

The fast delivery and timely delivery of the goods are the things which are valued by the customer, helps to increase the efficiency of the business and lower the inventory cost. It also helps to build consumer trust and build long term relationships that are valuable for the company.

Therefore, the marketing intermediaries, such as FedEx, add value to the distribution of goods and services by increasing the Utility.

Learn more:

1. Learn more about the business law

brainly.com/question/18628298

2. Learn more about the marketing mix

brainly.com/question/10485918

3. Learn more about the promotional mix

brainly.com/question/6193363

Answer details:

Grade: High School

Subject: Business Studies

Chapter: Marketing

Keywords: Marketing intermediaries, FedEx, distribution of goods and services, the added value, Utility, business studies, types of marketing.

Vikentia [17]2 years ago

3 0

This Added Value is known as Utility.

Fedex helps ship millions of products all over the world.

For the end customer, this utility is the the physically presence of the product they bought

You might be interested in

Ajax Beverages holds 40% of the stock of Bubbly Bottler, acquired at a cost equal to 40% of Bubbly's book value at the time of p

nata0808 [166]

Answer:

b. $100,420

Explanation:

Amount paid for investment $100,000

Add: Share of net income $400

($1000*40%)

Add: Share of other comprehensive income $20

($50*40%)

Investment at the end of 2021 $100,420

7 0

2 years ago

On January 1, 2018, Splash City issues $500,000 of 9% bonds, due in 20 years, with interest payable semiannually on June 30 and

Aleonysh [2.5K]

Answer:

Date Interest Interest Amortization Bond's

payment expense bond discount book value

Jan. 1, 2018 457,102

June 30, 2018 22,500 23,572.45 1,072.45 458,174.45

Dec. 31, 2018 22,500 23,572.45 1,072.45 459,246.90

Assuming you are using a straight line amortization of bond discount, then the amortization per coupon payment = $42,898 / 40 = $1,072.45

January 1, 2018, bonds are issued

Dr Cash 457,102

Dr Discount on bonds payable 42,898

Cr Bonds payable 500,000

June 30, 2021, first coupon payment

Dr Interest expense 23,572.45

Cr Cash 22,500

Cr Discount on bonds payable 1,072.45

December 31, 2021, second coupon payment

Dr Interest expense 23,572.45

Cr Cash 22,500

Cr Discount on bonds payable 1,072.45

If the company uses the effective interest method, the numbers vary a little:

amortization of bond discount on first coupon payment:

($457,102 x 5%) - ($500,000 x 4.5%) = $22,855.10 - $22,500 = $355.10

Journal entry to record first coupon payment:

Dr Interest expense 22,855.10

Cr Cash 22,500

Cr Discount on bonds payable 355.10

amortization of bond discount on second coupon payment:

($458,174.45 x 5%) - ($400,000 x 4.5%) = $22,908.72 - $22,500 = $408.72

Journal entry to record second coupon payment:

Dr Interest expense 22,908.72

Cr Cash 22,500

Cr Discount on bonds payable 408.72

7 0

2 years ago

Standlar Company makes and sells wireless speakers. The price of the standard model is $360 and its variable expenses are $210.

Vladimir79 [104]

Total contribution margin = $3,000, standard models sold at break even=800, deluxe models sold at break even=400, superior models sold at break even=100

Explanation:

1.Using sales mix stated in the fact from Figure to form a package what is the total contribution margin?

total contribution margin =($150 multiply 8) plus ($200 multiply 4) plus ($1,000 multiply 1) = $3,000

2.Refer to Figure, What is the number of standard models sold at break even.

break even units =Fixed cost divide contribution margin per package

= $300,000 divide $3000 =100 package standard models sold at break even=100 package multiply 8 = 800

2.Refer to Figure, What is the number of deluxe models sold at break even.

break even units

=Fixed cost divide contribution margin per package = $300,000 divide $3000

=100 package deluxe models sold at break even = 100 package multiply 4

6 0

2 years ago

____ is the price a firm paid to acquire an asset.

pashok25 [27]

B. Market Value
jwjjsjjsbjs

8 0

2 years ago

You have just taken a job at a manufacturing company and have discovered that they use absorption costing to analyze product cos

poizon [28]

Answer and Explanation:

Respected Sir,

Sub: Absorption costing to analyze product costs and subsequent cost-volume-profit decisions

As per your requirement please find the explanation below:

Absorption costing is a process by which we add part of the fixed overhead to the production expense of the goods. If we do on a per-unit basis. Here we will compute by dividing the fixed costs by the number of units that we built and sold over the era. Whereas Variable costing includes fixed overhead as a lump sum instead of a per-unit price.

Under this process, all your variable costs like equipment, raw materials, and shipping are included. We will add the maximum fixed overhead costs for the duration. Such costs are not calculated on a per-unit basis. Rather than we deduct them as a lump-sum expense from your income amount.

Variable costing is really useful as it reveals the earnings after all the expenses are paid for the accounting period. While you would not have earned revenue for the goods we purchased as some may be in the inventory, we are showing you have paid all of your expenses for the time. We have excess revenue when you actually sell the finished goods in the warehouse.

The absorption approach is not all that effective as absorption costing will inflate the income figures excessively in any given span of accounting. Since you're not going to subtract any of your fixed costs as we did not sell any of us produced goods, our profit and loss report doesn't reflect the maximum expenses you've had for the time. Therefore, these results may mislead us when our profitability is analyzed.

Regards

ABC

7 0

2 years ago