The things that could be moved were the passengers and heavy things which included iron and other heavy things.
<u>Explanation:</u>
When The railroad system got developed, it made a huge remark on the people and was a very helpful innovation. It was used to carry people from one place to the other place.
Not only passengers, the railroad system was also used to carry heavy things like iron, wood and so on from one place to the other, helping to develop trade and production activities. With time passing on, it got even more developed leading to the development of locomotives and iron rails.
I believe the correct answers are:
- an Indo-European language of Germanic origin: this is definitely true as old English (as well as modern English) belongs to the Germanic group of languages, along with Scandinavian languages (Swedish, Norwegian, Danish, Icelandic), German, Yiddish, etc. And all of them are Indo-European languages
- depended on inflections to indicate gender: this statement is also true. Old English, also known as Anglo-Saxon English, used different suffixes to denote the gender of a noun. So if a noun was female, it would have a different suffix from that of male/neuter gender. This has mostly disappeared from modern English.
- depended on inflections to indicate grammatical form: this statement is also true. Old English used different suffixes to denote the form of a word, such as the tense, or possessive form, etc. This is something that modern English has kept as well, and you can see it in -ed suffix for past tense, or 's used for possessive form.
These three options are definitely correct, whereas 'similar to modern English' is definitely incorrect because they almost look nothing alike. I'm not sure about the mixture of many languages though - it had many dialects, but ultimately it was one Germanic/Viking language, so I don't think other languages influenced it a lot at the time - that came later with Middle English.
Answer: (C).Give her advice and tips for how to get things done correctly and efficiently.
Explanation:
Question is: What are you most likely to do.
Every job has tricks that enable the employees to work more efficiently and thus be more productive. As the newest co-worker however, she may not know these tricks so does not know how to be as productive as the rest of you.
Best thing you can do is to give her advice and tips on how to be more productive in the company and hope that she takes it because that will be good for you and your co-workers as it will reduce your stress.
Answer:
Comma Splice
Explanation:
Comma splice can also be known as comma fault.
COMMAN SPLICE can be defined as the use of a comma to join two clauses that are independent which is why comma splice is a common grammatical error in English because two independent clauses are incorrectly joined by a comma in order to make one sentence which is why to avoid comma splices, we need to be able to identify an independent clause.
Therefore comma splice is sometimes used in literary writing in order to help convey a particular mood of informality.
In order word COMMAN SPLICE can be seen as the way in which comma is use to join two complete sentences without placing an appropriate joining word between them.
Question #1 Answer: Information found in charts, graphs, and videos can be used in
your argument.<span>
<span>Choices 1, 2 and 4 are incorrect. You need more than one evidence to
support your claim. If you only have one evidence, that would be called
ineffective support of your claim and will thus hurt your argument. Plus, research
plays a huge part in argumentative essays since that will be the basis of your argument.
Logos (logic) can only be found through facts from research. So, two facts
would be inadequate. Thus, Choice C is your answer.
Question #2 Answer: </span>An interview with a neighbor
who has strong opinions on rising gas prices.</span>
An argumentative essay requires facts from
research; research from credible sources. If you were to use an interview with
a neighbor as your research for your argument, you would indefinitely lose your
audience. An interview such as this is not fact, but opinion. An opinion without
fact is useless in an argumentative essay. Thus, Choice B is your answer.
Question #3 Answer: It is unverified. It does not cite a source to show where the
information was located. <span>
While that author may have good motives and valid reasoning, there are not any cited
sources to verify where he got his information from. For all I know, he could
be lying to me. Without citation, I cannot believe him. Thus, the answer is
Choice D.
</span>
Question #4 Answer: It is effective. It supports the claim clearly and logically.<span>
<span>The author states his claim with conciseness, he cites his source and he
supported his claim with evidence from a seemingly reliable source. Thus, the
answer is Choice A.
</span><span>Question #5 Answer: It is emotional. It
expresses personal feelings that cannot be backed with research. The
author completely tears apart his argumentative essay by implementing Ethos (personal
emotions). He says, “It’s heartbreaking.” Just with that, we see he uses/
expresses personal emotions without research. WITHOUT REASERCH!!! How disappointing.
Thus, the answer is </span><span>Choice B. </span></span>
