Answer:
The answer is C.
A 5 percent increase in the reproductive success of some genotypes, but a 5 percent decrease in the reproductive success of other genotypes
Explanation:
Incomplete question, here is the full question: https://quizlet.com/153540854/biology-107-part1-flash-cards/
For the genetic structure of a population to change, we can either depend on natural selection or mutations but there has to be an imbalance.
The answers given in the options A and B are referring to changes in genotypes which surely affects the genetic structure of the population but the way these options are given is in equilibrium, meaning they create and imbalance but then counter that with something else.
In option C, some genotypes get a 5 percent increase while some get a 5 percent decrease in their reproductive success, which will most likely result in a change in the genetic structure of a population.
I hope this answer helps.
If hunted and sold, animals will have a lower chance of reproducing apart from not being there themselves, decreasing their population.
Having less species inhabiting an area, means less food for some predators. Which means that competition will occur among preators since food will be scarce.
Answer:
Hope it helped,
Happy homework/ study/ exam!
When talking about evolution, a good example is bacterial resistance to antibiotics.
We start with a bacteria colony, and in contact with antibiotics, most of them die.
Some of them in the colony do not die and took that antibiotic to create a mutation of its DNA to be resistance to that.
They evolved survive that antibiotic.
Answer:
No it is not a scientific theory.
Explanation:
An explanation of any aspect of the natural phenomenon of the world that can be tested several times and well supported by the evidence, and follows the scientific method. Furthermore known as scientific theory.
Presently, a logical hypothesis must meet a few rules, and one of those is that it must be upheld by a few (and free) strands of proof.
For this situation, we have just one hypothesis, that bulldogs are great pet and Meatball is great among bulldogs, and it isn't sufficient, at that point it can not be a scientific theory.
The answer to this question is b
