Writing from Grendel's point of view, makes him seem more monstrous and dangerous.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Writing from Grendel's perspective makes him seem more monstrous. Even though we get to see the story from his perspective, he has a very narrow range of emotions. He is unable to relate to the actual humans in the book, showing that he is fundamentally different from them. Beowulf and the other warriors are typical humans, and Grendel is a one-dimensional monster.
The lack of common ground between these two kinds of characters makes the division between them very obvious. Therefore, it's difficult to find sympathy for Grendel as you would for another human.
Answer: I do not understand your question. Claudius is again a weak king and Gertrude is very foolish. They were corrupt and the people around them were corrupt.
Hope this helps! :)
Explanation:
<span>The answer in this question is D He should add logos, with evidence to support his ideas and link them together. The best rhetorical appeal for javed to add is logos with evidence to support his ideas and link them together.</span>
