All categories

2 years ago

Why doesn’t Bruno try to protect his friend when Lieutenant kotler attacks shmuel

1 answer:

7 0

I think Bruno didn’t try to protect his friend when Shmuel is attacked by Lieutenant Kotler is because he was so scare of what Lieutenant did to the servant. Bruno didn’t have the courage to stand up for his friend eventhrough that he really did want to.
• Have you ever done something to a friend that made you feel bad or ashamed? How does shame and remorse figure into the friendship between Bruno and Shmuel? How does Bruno show his remorse?

Everyone makes mistakes and also did I. Right after Bruno answered Lieutenant, he felt ashame about his words. Bruno was too innocent, he didn’t know that eating a piece of chicken can get Shmuel to the punishment of death. As he felt to sorry for Shmuel, he was the one that insisted Shmuel to take the chicken and he was the one who didn’t tell the truth. In order to show his remorse, Bruno went to the place they usually meet and waited for Shmuel eventhrough that Shmuel didn’t show up for few days. But then he did, and that was when Bruno apologized to Shmuel. (He hesitated for a moment, not wanting to get sidetracked. He felt that he should say it one last time and really mean it. ‘I’m very sorry, Shmuel,’ he said in a clear voice. ‘I can’t believe I didn’t tell him the truth. I’ve never let a friend down like that before. Shmuel, I’m ashamed of myself.’ Pg 175, ch 15).

You might be interested in

Read the passage from both the feminist and historical perspectives. In one paragraph, explain what each perspective reveals abo

ser-zykov [4K]

Answer:

Using a historical perspective helps the reader understand that Nnaemeka’s decision to marry Nene goes against long-standing traditions. He marries for love instead of taking part in an arranged marriage. He also marries outside of his tribe. As a result of his choice, his father shuns him. A feminist perspective reveals the marriage also goes against patriarchal values in this society. Women are expected to be homemakers. However, Nene is a teacher and does not fit the expectation. Both perspectives help the reader understand opposition to the marriage. However, one approach focuses on tradition, while the other focuses on the treatment of women in their culture.

Explanation:

This is the sample response from ed

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Read the excerpt from "Lise Marie de Baissac."

jeka94

Answer:

D. As a spy in Normandy, Baissac performed a variety of important and sometimes dangerous tasks in order to get in the way of German troops.

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which statement best describes the relationship between Byron and the two romantic poets Samuel Taylor Coleridge and William Wor

Sphinxa [80]

I think the answer should be A

8 0

2 years ago

V) The following passage has not been edited. There is one error in each line. Write

erik [133]

Answer:

a. went

b. for

c. was

d. going

e. when

f. to

g. faced

h. of

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi went to England for higher studies at the age of 19. His mother was apprehensive about young men going astray in western society. But her fears were allayed when Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi swore not to touch meat, wine and women. He faced a lot of difficulties due to his vegetarianism.

Explanation:

In this excerpt, we should use the Past Simple, as the whole story refers to the past. Therefore, we should use verbs like went, was, faced, etc...

The construction go for something means try to achieve a goal, in this case, he tried to finish his higher studies.

e.g. Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi went to England for higher studies at the age of 19.

The construction to be afraid/worried/apprehensive about + V+ -ing contains the verb with -ing at the end, as a part of this construction, so, in this case, we should change the verb form from go to going.

e.g. . His mother was apprehensive about young men going astray in western society.

But her fears were allayed when Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi swore not to touch meat, wine and women.

In this sentence, we should use when instead of that, because when acts as a conjunction meaning at the time that.

We use the construction not to when we want to emphasize the absence of some action; in this case, that he will not touch meat, wine and women.

The construction a lot of refers to a large number or amount of things (in this case difficulties).

He faced a lot of difficulties due to his vegetarianism.

7 0

2 years ago

In the last paragraph, the author states that Lucy was known for her intelligence. Which sentence from the passage best supports

Mnenie [13.5K]

Choice A best supports that Lucy was known for her intelligence. Taking college classes at age thirteen is a difficult feat.

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers