Answer:
In the ideal sense, if Morgandi can transfer the knowledge she acquired from using the measuring tools while cooking to her math class, she will be able to learn the math quicker.
She will find it much easier than Eric to understand the math lessons about fractions
Morgandi was actively learning about fractions so she was practicing fractions. For Eric, he is probably learning about fractions for the first time so it will take time and practice for him to grasp the concept. If he is learning cognitively, he will need to actively practice fractions, for example, helping their mother cook and using measuring tools.
It will be easier for her as the math class will be like her cookng experience.Her mind may process the information in a way that it relates to her cooking experience.Morgandi is said to bring more interest to the learning situation than Eric.
She already has experience with the subject so it should be easier for her to learn. However, she may have to build her procedural knowledge, such as how to divide and multiply the fractions. Eric, however, who has never used fractions will have to obtain both declarative and procedural knowledge. He will have to learn general knowledge about fractions as well as how to divide and multiply them. Because of this, Eric will most likely take longer to learn the material.
Explanation:
in the learning process, an important factor to look to is what the individual brings to new learning situations. Having a foundational knowledge on which to construct additional knowledge will give one an edge over another as in the case of Morgandi who has a back up experience of cooking than Eric
Answer:The correct answer is that if in the house there are independent members it means that they can become very valuable to both parties as they can become swing votes.
Explanation:
It is also knwon that there are not many representatives who would declare as independent as politcs tend to be very one sided.
The correct answer is letter D
Critical thinking consists of analyzing and evaluating the consistency of reasoning, especially the statements that society considers to be true in the context of everyday life.
This evaluation can be carried out through observation, experience, reasoning or the scientific method. Critical thinking requires clarity, precision, fairness and evidence, since it aims to avoid particular impressions. In this sense, it is related to skepticism and the detection of fallacies.
First of all, there is no reason to charge the wife - she is not doing anything wrong.
Also, it would not be a homicide, unless he kills his wife.
It is also not negligence, since he is actively abusing her.
So the correct answer is:
a. When the husband is charged, the case would be a criminal case.
Even though im not going to write the whole word document for you, I can help you with my investigation for those questions you have. The answer is YES because <span>there must be laws in place to prevent some things that might inhibit ones "entitlement to enjoy life" but should not be to extreme. In itself Locke was right, because he was supporting a kind of freedom for every citizen. I hope this can help you</span>
