Here are the answers for the three questions;
1) According to socrates, must one heed popular opinion about moral matters?
Crito realizes that Socrates blamed not justly for his crimes. In spite of this, Socrates won't attempt to get away from his destiny.
Crito's first contention to Socrates is about what individuals will think. Crito says that Socrates' companions will be blamed for being excessively frightened or excessively shabby, making it impossible to organize his escape. He at that point contends that Socrates is giving his foes what they need by accepting his destiny. Crito urges him to battle the foul play that has happened. Socrates answers that Crito ought not to worry over how he is seen by others; he should center rather on living the correct way. He reminds Crito that popular opinion isn't generally the best opinion.
2) Does Socrates accept the fairness of the laws under which he was tried and convicted?
Socrates said to Crito that one is never just in fouling up, regardless of whether it is for the correct reasons. As it were, two wrongs don't make a right. Socrates has made consent to comply with the laws of Athens and has delighted in the benefits of these laws for a long time. On the off chance that he endeavored to escape it would not just break his agreement, which would not be right, yet additionally challenge the authority of the law.
3) Would Socrates have been wrong to escape?
He trusts it is inappropriate to get away or escape. This belief depends on what we call the social contract hypothesis of government today.
Hope it helps :)
I believe the answer is: B. Say they will vote against a candidate because of the candidates race.
I’ve honestly never heard of using food as currency. Maybe they shouldn’t because for one, it’s edible, it can expire, and people can eat it. Secondly, it’s easily reproducible, people can dry their own peas and become rich. Lastly, aren’t dried peas way too small? They can easily be lost,.
Answer:
I would say that the best answer to the statement: The tests the trainer gave were intended to measure more than just recall of facts about the book, would be: False.
Explanation:
The example that we are shown here comes from situations that are given in a test that is known as the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Test, and they are intended to measure the capability that a person has to reason, and think critically.
In this case, we would say that the statement is false regarding the case in question, because the trainer issues the tests not to measure either the recall, or the abilities and concepts that the students acquired from the book, but she actually wanted to see if the video format of teaching was actually more efficient than the actual book. Given that this was her intention, to measure the video vs. the book, in achieving her final goal, which was acquirement of skills and concepts on Time Management, her test must have been geared towards that end, and not to simply measure the book´s impact. It was a bonus that afterwards she found that those students who were exposed to the video later on decided to read the book. Given the information on the case itself, we can reason that the answer is false.
Public affairs officers (PAO) are formed by the army personal, officers, and civilians who deal with the public relationship affairs and the media. For example, PAO write press releases and speeches for politicians (Option a) and establish relationships with members of the media (Option e). They also informe the superior officers about relevant news and are very important to protect classified information from leaking, you could say PAO are like the eyes and the ears of the government, because they see and hear news in order to pass it to their superiors.
