Answer:Group polarization
Explanation:
Group polarization is when a group which shares similar attitudes work together towards intensifying those attitudes more than they did when they had these ideas separately as individuals. Some intensified shared ideas may be risky such as when unrulyb mob gangs comes together to push their attitudes.
Some may breed fruitful actions such as mobilising together to protect the right of animals which may save lives of many animals.
Group Polarization makes an action possible that would have been impossible if someone was standing for the idea alone, numbers increase the strength of the idea to be implemented.
Group Polarization exist in order to give strength to persuasion, the attitude of a group is improved by their number more than it would if they were standing alone.
The best evaluation would be that the statement is invalid because we cannot be sure if the argument is referring to the same <span>provost. The whole paragraph is a fallacy. It was not directly stated that James Hoopster was the provost who saved the university from crisis. It just so happened that James Hoopster took the same path as to the provost who saved the university.</span>
<span>A grievance that can not be resolved through the normal grievance process it moves to arbitration. In this process the parties appeal to a third party arbitrator who is empowered to make a decision binding on both parties. In most industrial cases, the arbitrator is randomly chosen from a list agreed upon by both parties. One benefit of deferring to an arbitrator is that it is less costly that resolving disputes through the judicial system.</span>
Answer:
Group decision making provides two advantages over decisions made by individuals: synergy and sharing of information. Synergy is the idea that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. When a group makes a decision collectively, its judgment can be keener than that of any of its members.
Explanation:
The system of checks and balances was created so that one branch does not obtain more power and virtually "conquer" the government. It was created by our founding fathers when they realized that there first draft of an idea of government was not very easy to handle. Those were the Articles of Confederation which gave a few branches to much power over the people and government. In my opinion, the power of the branches is more or less fairly split.
Hope this helps!! Do good on your test/assignment
