On the off chance that finished with care and thinking ahead, changing work methodology can build profitability. Be that as it may if done shamefully, doing as such can without much of a stretch be counter profitable.
This incorporates knowing the dangers of their occupations and their work environment and knowing how to control these risks. Having composed safe work practices and techniques is a fundamental part of an OH&S program. A training is an arrangement of rules to enable specialists to play out an assignment that may not require a well-ordered strategy.
Answer:
<em>Inspirational Appeal</em>
Explanation:
Inspirational Appeal happens when <em>the traditional transition leader uses motivation mostly in downward fashion to affect maximum performance in a group.</em>
The leader ultimately ties the intended action or result to a set of principles and beliefs which the group honors.This panders to emotions, which are a primary motivating driver.
An instance is when a new leader shares their ambition for future success and not only receives assistance by doing so, but also sparks passion for significant change.
Motivation and inspiration often involves behavior modelling and example setting for someone else to pursue.
Answer:
The company should make the components because incremental costs are $2 less than the purchase price
Explanation:
The cost of making each unit of component = Direct Labour + Direct Material + Variable Overhead*
*The overhead cost of $4 contains both a fixed and variable element. It has been mentioned that 25% of overhead cost is incremental i.e. it increases with each additional unit produced (marginal cost). The incremental cost is the variable element.
Variable element = $4 x 25% = $1
Fixed element = $4 x 75% = $3
Thus, the cost of making each unit of component = $5 + $2 + $1 = $8,
whereas the cost of purchasing each unit of complement is $10. Hence, the company should produce the component as it is less by $2 ($10 - $8) to produce than it is to purchase.
Answer: $22.22
Explanation:
We can use the dividend discount model to solve for this.
The formula is,
P = D1 / r - g
Where,
D1 = the next dividend
r = the expected return
g = the growth rate.
We do not have the expected return but we can calculate for it using the old stock price and growth rate. Making it x we have,
28.5 = 0.5 / x - 0.075
28.5 (x - 0.075) = 0.5
x = 0.5 / 28.5 + 0.075
x = 0.09254385964
x = 9.25 %
Now that we have the expected return we can calculate the new stock price with the new growth rate,
P = 0.5 / 9.25% - 7%
P = 22.2222222222
P = $22.22
The new stock price is $22.22
Answer:
b. $4,908,000
Explanation:
According to the FASB GAAP, the straight line method is used in this given question which is shown below:
= (Original cost - residual value) ÷ (useful life)
= ($40,900,000 - $4,090,000) ÷ (15 years)
= ($36,810,000) ÷ (15 years)
= $2,454,000
In this method, the depreciation is same for all the remaining useful life
For two years, the accumulated depreciation would be
= Annual year depreciation × number of years
= $2,454,000 × 2 years
= $4,908,000
