Answer:
Peer group
Explanation:
Peer group -
It refers to the combination of people , combined together because of some common interest , is referred to as a peer group.
This group tries to attract and influences other person to join and follow their group .
A peer group can be good as well as bad in belief .
Hence , from the given scenario of the question ,
The correct answer is peer group .
To differentiate between the two, that way you don’t accidentally put plastic in the trash bin
Hope dis helped Fam ;)
Answer:
Pavlov used proved his theory of classical conditioning by studying salivation in dogs. He observed an unconditioned response, the salivation, that was a consequence of an unconditioned stimulus (the meat). Then, he paired the unconditioned response with a neutral stimulus (the sound of a bell), by giving the dog the meat after ringing the bell. He found that after being conditioned, the dog salivated every time he heard the bell ring, the salivation was now a conditioned response.
Answer:
she creates a positive externality for Kara and a negative externality for Susie
Explanation:
Susie lives in a dorm and likes to play loud music in her room. Her neighbor Kara enjoys the same type of music and gets pleasure from Susie turning up the music. Her other neighbor, Alex, can't stand Susie's music and gets mad when she turns it up for all to hear. When Susie plays her music loudly, she creates <u>a positive externality for Kara and a negative externality for Susie</u>. Externalities are defined as the cost or benefit affecting an individual who is not directly involved in an activity such as the production of a good or the rendering of a service. Externalities can be positive if an individual benefits from the activity. That the effect of the activity on a third party is beneficial such as Kara who benefits/enjoys Susie's music and externalities can also be negative if the activity is detrimental to the individual such as Alex who is uncomfortable with Susie's loud music.
Answer: As long as they choose the wording carefully, a random sample is not important.
