The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Compare rules you may follow at home, at school, or at work. As you cross internal boundaries each day, why would each of these places have separate sets of rules?
At home, absolute I have to follow family rules. They are basic but non-negotiable. More than rules, these are principles that are base on love and commitment.
But when I am at school, yes, there is a set of rules on how to behave in class and on the premises, and how to correctly relate to each other, It is a challenge. It is my personality, behavior, and customs versus other students' and teachers' ideas. It is not an easy thing to do.
The workplace is something similar but with professional connotations. As pro people say, it is a job and you have to behave like one because the consequences are tough.
So it is true that we have to obey a different set of rules, according to the place we are.
Agricultural needs and developers had decreased the water supply. The Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan, or CERP, is a plan authorized by the U.S. Congress in 2000 with the intention of restoring south Florida's ecossystem, initially estimated to cost 8 billion dollars and take 30 years. <u>CERP primarily seeks eviromental restoration but would also benefit both cities and farmlands by increasing the water supply in the region</u>.
It can be a technique to shorten or make it still at the point of conversation and avoid unrelated issues or situation. It also makes the discussion brief and concise. This provides other people to give their own opinion at a given time. There also might be an allotted time for each people.
The answer is <u>"naturalistic observational design".</u>
Naturalistic Observation refers to a study method that includes secretively or unmistakably watching subjects' practices in their common habitat, without intercession. Naturalistic observation is a typical research technique in conduct sciences, for example, humanism and brain research.
This strategy is incredible on the grounds that the specialists can see the subject's conduct in their own common settings, however one noteworthy impediment is the way that it isn't generally completely clear what causes certain responses when you are managing such huge numbers of factors.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The challenges to education that the current knowledge explosion pose are the following.
First, the challenge to really understand concepts instead of just barely know something more. There are millions of pages on the internet. Students just have to click on the internet searching for an answer, and that's it. They have their answer. But one thing is to get an answer and another completely different thing is to use critical thinking t understand a concept, and idea; its context, causes, definitions, alternatives, and so on.
Another challenge is the use of technology as a means of distraction and entertainment, instead of learning. Technology is a great tool, but it does not substitute the teacher in the classroom. A "hybrid" model that combines the two could be the answer in the future.
Another challenge could be the capacity of technology to reach every single corner of the country in developed countries and undeveloped nations. Not everybody has the money to permanently access technology devices and internet resources as a way to "attend school online." Poverty, lack of resources, geography, and other circumstances often hinder many students to attend school online.
