Option D
The negative halo effect is a disadvantage of franchising for a franchisee
<u>Explanation:</u>
The halo effect is a kind of cognitive racism in which our overall hypothesis of a person impacts how we think and speculate about his or her personality. Thoughts of a particular characteristic can transfer over to how personas look at other features of that personality.
If a franchisee does not exist up to the excellence criteria of the franchisor this can have a contrary reputational impact not simply on the franchisee, but the wider credit of the franchisor as well. Thus, there is a peril in empowering others not undeviatingly related to the business to practice the business name and logo.
Answer:
The optimal bundle is 6 pairs of dress shoes and 3 pairs of Crocs.
Explanation:
From the question,
Allowance (M) = $450; Price of dress shoes, Pd = $50; Price of crocs, Pc = $50
Note: MRS-price ratio, MUC- marginal utility from consuming casual Crocs ,MUD- marginal utility from consuming dress shoes
Optimal bundle is determined where MRS = Price ratio
MRS = MUC/MUD = 20DC/10C2 = 2D/C
Price ratio = Pd/Pc = 50/50 = 1
So, 2D/C = 1
Therefore, C = 2D
Budget constraint: M = Pd*D + Pc*C
So, 50D + 50*(2D) = 450
50D + 100D = 150D = 450
So, D = 450/150 = 3
C = 2D = 2*3 = 6
Answer:
The degree to which the portfolio variance is reduced depends on the degree of correlation between securities is the correct answer.
Explanation: