Answer:
Multibranding strategy
Explanation:
Multibranding strategy can be defined as a type of strategy in which a company gives its product a different brand name. It involves a producer selling different brands under the same product segment.
In Multibranding strategy there is no space for other competitors in the market. This strategy also strengthens the influence of these various products in the market.
A Multibranding strategy can lead to a great loss if it is not properly handled by the management of the organisation.
<h2>
Clarify the assignment would be the first step john should take to increase Kerry's responsibilities.</h2>
Explanation:
Option A: If a new work is assigned or an additional work is assigned, it is necessary to first explain about the new responsibility and clarify about the assignment. This would ensure Kerry to continue the work smoothly.
Option B: Feedback is always welcome but this is not the first step to add responsibilities.
Option C: Notifying others is the responsibility of John and not Kerry. So this choice is invalid.
Option D: Accountability though it is mandatory comes only in the closure part.
In the long run, if inputs are increased by 10 percent and output increases by 20 percent, then diseconomies of scale are said to exist. It is because diseconomies of scale is likely to happen in the long run for a business with increasing inputs without decreasing the cost of production. It can happen when the increase in production is dependent on one part that needs to be completed but there is a delay on producing the parts. Another reason is that the cost of shipping may increase base on how far will be the distance and the weight of the product.
Answer:
Explanation:
Assume: The Federal Alternative Minimum Tax rate of 20%
G.R EDWIN INC $
Sales 6, 020, 000.00
Less:
Cost of goods sold 3, 060,000.00
Gross profit 2,960,000.00
Less:
Operating Expenses 2,650,000.00
Profit 310,000.00
Less: Int Expense 27,000.00
Net Profit 283,000.00
Tax liability assuming tax rate of 20%
= 283,000 * 20%
=$56,600
Answer:
Explanation:
This incident occurred as a result of natural disaster which was beyond the control of the parties involved. Moreover , this incident would have been covered by so many news media and channels which would serve as evidences to buttress their claim.
Therefore , it is easier to make a defense in the fact that the breach occurred due to the natural disaster that was neither forseen nor could be prevented by their effort.
