answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
shepuryov [24]
2 years ago
15

Seventy-Two Inc., a developer of radiology equipment, has stock outstanding as follows: 60,000 shares of cumulative preferred 2%

stock, $60 par and 300,000 shares of $20 par common. During its first four years of operations, the following amounts were distributed as dividends: first year, $51,000; second year, $105,000; third year, $81,000; fourth year, $120,000. Determine the dividends per share on each class of stock for each of the four years. Round your answers to two decimal places. If no dividends are paid in a given year, enter "0".
Business
1 answer:
SSSSS [86.1K]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Year 1: Dividend paid to cumulative preferred stock = $51,000; Dividend paid to common stock = 0.

Year 2: Dividend paid to cumulative preferred stock = $93,000; Dividend paid to common stock = $12,000.

Year 3: Dividend paid to cumulative preferred stock = $72,000; Dividend paid common stock = $9,000.

Year 4: Dividend paid to cumulative preferred stock = $72,000; Dividend paid common stock = $48,000.

Explanation:

Year 1

Dividend distributed = $51,000

Cumulative preferred stock dividend payable = 60,000 * $60 * 2% = $72,000

Dividend paid to cumulative preferred stock = $51,000

Carried forward cumulative preferred stock dividend = $72,000 - $51,000 = $21,000

Dividend paid to common stock = 0

Year 2

Dividend distributed = $105,000

Year 2 cumulative preferred stock dividend due = 60,000 * $60 * 2% = $72,000

Cumulative preferred stock dividend payable = Due in year 2 + Carried down from year 1 = $72,000 + $21,000 = $93,000

Dividend paid to cumulative preferred stock = $93,000

Dividend paid to common stock = $105,000 - $93,000 = $12,000

Year 3

Dividend distributed = $81,000

Cumulative preferred stock dividend payable = 60,000 * $60 * 2% = $72,000

Dividend paid to cumulative preferred stock = $72,000

Dividend paid common stock = $81,000 - $72,000 = $9,000

Year 4

Dividend distributed = $120,000

Cumulative preferred stock dividend payable = 60,000 * $60 * 2% = $72,000

Dividend paid to cumulative preferred stock = $72,000

Dividend paid common stock = $120,000 - $72,000 = $48,000

You might be interested in
What are three techniques stockholders can use to motivate managers to maximize their stock’s long-run price? Should managers fo
Romashka [77]

Answer:

Please see below.

Explanation:

a.

• Reasonable compensation package. Every stockholders would usually want a good return on their investments. One of the techniques that can be used by them is to offer good and reasonable compensation packages to the company's highly performing executives and managers. The aim is to spur them to act in the best interest of the stockholders and not themselves. This will also translate to better performance of the company.

• Firing of managers who don't perform well. If a company's stock is not performing well(does not appreciate), such would usually be tied to its board and managers. Stockholders are the owners of a company because their funds are being used to trade hence can threaten to replace or actually replace any manager who is not performing well. By so doing, the managers that are retained will be motivated to perform really well in order to retain their jobs hence translate to better company performance.

• Threat of hostile take over. Stockholders could also threaten a company's board of being taken over by a proven and well accomplished company , if their stock price does not improve overtime. When the managers or board realize that their job is being threatened, they will be motivated to act fast by ensuring that the company's stocks yield adequate return in the long run.

b.

What should be paramount to managers is how to ensure that their company's intrinsic stocks value(an estimate of the true value of a stock, that is premised on well calculated risk) are well maximized. The stockholders should also be carried along while this process is on going. By maximizing their stock's intrinsic value, such would bring about high value to the stocks, while as time goes on, the actual stock price will be much closer to the intrinsic value of the stocks.

6 0
2 years ago
Which of the following statements is FALSE? a. Cause-and-Effect forecasting assumes that one or more factors are related to dema
Oduvanchick [21]

Answer:

It is generally not recommended to use a combination of both quantitative and qualitative methods.

Explanation:

For business success it is important to use a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods.

Quantitative methods involves getting insight from data by using formulas, models and other mathematical methods to draw conclusions. Facts and logic is used to make business decisions.

Qualitative methods involve insights that is not based on mathematical methods, for example finding out what motivates consumer spending. It uses tools such as surveys and interviews.

7 0
2 years ago
An industrial plant needs to make 100,000 parts per month to meet demand. Each month contains 20 working days, each of which all
Ratling [72]

Answer:

Part A:

Workers Needed=20.833≅21

Part B:

Productivity of individual worker=2.0833 parts/hour

Part C:

Multifactor productivity=0.0832 Parts/$

Explanation:

Part A:

Total parts =100,000

Workers needed= Total parts/(Parts per hour* hours per shift*Total Shifts)

Worker\ needed=\frac{100000}{10\ Parts/hour*8\ hours/shift*60\ shifts/worker} \\Workers\ needed= 20.833

Workers needed=20.833≅21

Part B:

Productivity of individual worker:

Productivity\ of\ individual\ worker=\frac{100000}{100\ workers*8\ hours/shift*60\ shifts/worker} \\Productivity\ of\ individual\ worker=2.0833\ parts/hour

Part C:

Total cost of material= $10*100,000=$1,000,000

Capital Costl= $100,000

Total labor Cost=21\ workers*8\ hours/shift*60\ shifts/worker*\$10/hour

Total labor Cost=$100,800

Multifactor productivity=Total Parts/(Total cost of material+capital cost+Total labor Cost)

Multifactor\ productivity=\frac{100000}{\$1,000,000+\$100,000+\$100,800} \\ Multifactor\ productivity=0.08324\ Parts/\$

3 0
2 years ago
Last year Electric Autos had sales of $175 million and assets at the start of the year of $300 million. If its return on start-o
nalin [4]

Answer:

Operating profit margin = 25.71%

Explanation:

Amount of return on asset = Rate of return x Asset value

Amount of return on asset = 15% x $300,000,000

Amount of return on asset = $45,000,000

Operating profit margin = Amount of return on asset / Sales

Operating profit margin = $45,000,000 / $175,000,000

Operating profit margin = 0.257143

Operating profit margin = 25.71%

5 0
2 years ago
Ariana loves new electronic products, but she also wants to make sure she gets a good value for her money. Therefore, she typica
qwelly [4]

Answer:

This question lacks answers. Here they are:

A) ​Early adopter  

B) ​Early majority  

C) ​Innovator  

D) Late majority  

E) ​Laggard

Answer is B) <em>​Early majority  </em>

Explanation:

These are the adoption categories. They measure how inclined a customer is to adopting a new product or technology. Each category describes the main aim and goal of the customer when trying the new product.

Naturally, all categories are on the gradual scale:

Innovators -> Early adopter -> Early majority -> Late Majority - > Laggard

with the <em>innovator</em> being the group that is adopting the product immediately after launch, while the <em>laggard</em> is very change-resistant, rarely making choices regarding the adoption of something new.

The thinnest line is probably the difference between <em>early adopters</em> and the <em>early majority</em>. Early adopters are not as fast as innovators when it comes to product adopting and they are often doing it because of coolness or the "wow" factor of the product. Although the time of adoption for the early majority is the same or a little bit longer than early adopters, the key difference is that the early majority puts functionality over coolness when something is new and ready for adoption.

In this example, Ariana want to receive great functionalities for the given money, so she turns to ratings, reviews and recommendations from early adopters and innovators (Eric). Eventually, when it is determined that the product proves its value, the early majority adopts it.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Dockwiller inc. manufactures industrial components. one of its products, which is used in the construction of industrial air con
    9·1 answer
  • Jessica is trying to get a credit card. She has a credit score of 790. How is Jessica’s lender likely to view this credit score?
    13·2 answers
  • Johanna Taylor, a creative developer at Leo Technologies Inc., is developing a website for the company. To address the usability
    6·1 answer
  • On January 1, the first day of the fiscal year, Designer Fabric Inc. issues a $3,000,000, 8%, 10-year bond that pays semiannual
    8·1 answer
  • Cost pressure from international competitors pushes companies toward greater scale and efficiency. But some products must also m
    7·1 answer
  • Friends International is an NGO that fosters greater cultural awareness and understanding by arranging for people of different b
    15·1 answer
  • Clayborn Company deposits all cash receipts on the day they are received and makes all cash payments by check. At the close of b
    8·1 answer
  • Assuming that monthly returns are approximately normally distributed, what is the probability that this market-neutral strategy
    6·1 answer
  • What are the most likely options for Maggie in the
    12·2 answers
  • If Bangladesh is open to international trade in oranges without any restrictions, it will ___________ tons of oranges. Suppose t
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!