Answer:
C. Businesses create goods for product markets to sell.
Explanation:
Answer:
FCFE: 99
Explanation:
FCFE: cash flow from operation - CAPEX + borrowing
we calcualte the cash flwo form operation using the indirect method:
net income - preferred dividends = available for common stock
income = 125 + 14 = 139
net income 139
depreciation expense 50
change in working capital (30)
cash flow from operation: 159
CAPEX will be the long term assets investment
investment on fixed capital<u> 100 </u>
CAPEX 100
net borrowing 40
159 -100 + 40 = 99
Answer:
812.40 units
Explanation:
Given that,
Annual holding cost percentage = 20%
Ordering cost = $110 per order
Annual demand = 15,000 units
Units Ordered - Price Per Unit
1-250 - $30.00
251-500 - $28.00
501-750 - $26.00
751 and up - $25.00
Optimal order quantity:
= 
= 
= 
= 812.40
Therefore, the optimal order quantity is 812.40 units.
Answer:
Memo
To: The Finance Manager
From: The Payables Accountant
Subject: Bank Loan to Pay Suppliers
Date: October 5, 2020
The above subject on our previous discussion refers.
This memo clarifies the advantage of borrowing from our bank the sum of $100,000 in order to offset the account of our supplier who has offered us the trade terms of 2/10, n/30.
Recall that the bank loan's interest rate is 6% per annum. If we borrow within the month and repay 30 days after, the interest cost will be $500 ($100,000 * 6%/12).
You can compare this to the discount we shall receive from the supplier totaling $2,000 ($100,000 * 2%). We can even extend the bank loan to 2 months, thereby paying a total interest cost of $1,000 ($500 * 2).
The implication is that we shall be making some gains by taking advantage of the cash discount. May you approve the loan based on this clarifications.
Regards,
Tony Ohagwam
Explanation:
This memorandum attempts to justify the request for a bank loan in order to settle the bill of one of our company's suppliers. It demonstrates the huge financial benefits that are implicit in accepting cash discounts from suppliers.
Answer:
Yes. Roy can successfully challenge this arbitration award in court.
Explanation:
According to the law, an arbitration clause is a part of the contract between Roy and Secure Investments, Inc. that deals with these parties' rights and options in the event of a legal dispute over their contract. Like in most arbitration clauses, Roy and Secure Investments, Inc. must have agreed not to sue each other but instead, to resolve their disputes through the arbitration process. But the res judicata effect produced through an arbitration can either be challenged and appealed against or enforced. Roy, depending on the merits of his case, can make a successful appeal against the arbitration award and not against the arbitration itself.
