Answer:
The dollar variance is -$100.
The percent variance is -20%.
Since the actual income is less than the budgeted income, the variance is unfavorable (U).
We calculate Dollar Variance as : 
Next, we calculate percent variance as :
Plugging the values in we get,
Percent Variance = -20%
Answer:
$3,927
Explanation:
For the computation of bid price first we need to follow some steps which is shown below:-
Manufacturing overhead rate = Overhead cost ÷ Machine hours
= 45,000 ÷ 100,000
= $0.45
Total manufacturing cost charged to the school
= 2,000 + 400 + (900 × 0.45)
= $2,805
Markup cost = $2,805 × 0.4
= $1,122
Bid price of job = Total manufacturing cost charged to school + Markup cost
= $2,805 + $1,122
= $3,927
Answer:
c. 67,757 errors per million opportunities
Explanation:
The computation of the errors per million opportunities is shown below:
= Customer complaints last week ÷ total guest stayed in that week × 1,000,000
= 29 customers ÷ 428 guests × 1,000,000
= 67,757 errors per million opportunities
Hence, the correct option is c.
We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come
And, the same is to be considered
Answer:
True
Explanation:
An organization that makes use of multisegment marketing approach is undoubtedly a big company that have established name for itself. This means that, the organization or company is well known and that it is an household name in the industry. Therefore, such company has the capacity of using multisegment marketing approach.
But a small company will only make use of one pricing method, this is to attract people to its products. And avoid competing with the established organizations. So, in the process, creating name for itself.
Answer:
c. Dorothy should consider the threats to her independence and whether safeguards may be applied that reduce the threat(s) to an acceptable level.
Explanation:
The best application of the AICPA conceptual framework approach in this scenario is that: Dorothy should consider the threats to her independence and whether safeguards may be applied that reduce the threat(s) to an acceptable level.
<u>The threat of independence in the scenario is not high enough to warrant the resignation of Dorothy from the audit team because her friend is not the Finance Director or person in charge of primary preparation of the financial statements but just a member in the internal audit team, hence the risk to her independence is relatively moderate.</u>
Dorothy already believes that she will be objective, hence she should consider the threats to her independence and whether safeguards may be applied that reduce the threat(s) to an acceptable level.
