Answer:
Yes they can continue advert but only if the 1% is equivalent or greater than the 10$ spent on advert.
Explanation:
There is an increase in revenue by 1%, this indicates that a number of people were attracted to the product because of the advert. With this the company might do better with consistent advert in subsequent year. They can change the channel of advert, improve on the quality of advert or change the time and location of the advert. Infarct, the 1% increment in revenue can be up to 20$ since we are not sure of the exact company's revenue. But if the 1% is far lower than the amount spent, the company can seek advice from professionals.
I THINK ITS MIDDLE FINGERS AT THESE AHOLE MODERATORS
Answer: the correct answer is B. (i) and (iii) only
Explanation:
A natural monopoly is a monopoly in an industry in which huge infrastructural costs and other fences to entry relative to the size of the market give the largest supplier in an industry, often the first supplier in a market, an overwhelming advantage over potential competitors.
(i) multiple firms would likely each have to pay large fixed costs to develop their own network of pipes. This is true but often times it is just one big company the one that serves the whole market or a partnership of two or (rarely) three companies that works as a big company.
(iii) a single firm can serve the market at the lowest possible average total cost. This is true because a natural monopoly has scale economies that's why it can offer the lowest possible average total costs.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Workplace safety is the responsibility of the employer to provide a safe place to work for the employees. According to Occupational Safety and Health administration it is necessary to follow certain job safety standards by the employer. The employer has to give safety awareness to the employees. Employees can utilize the safety empowerment and report to management if there are any safety issues.
The government's responsibility is to set standards for the business enterprises to maintain their workplace safety. The government collects fines if anything is beyond the safety regulations or improper standards of organisations.
Answer:
Increased responsibility for corporate officers
Explanation:
A review of eight thousand public companies, on the study of the impact of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) of 2002 revealed that <u>SOX increased directors' workload and risk, and increased demand by mandating that firms have more outside directors. </u>
It was also revealed that both broad-based changes and cross-sectional changes (by firm size) occurred <u>because Board committees meet more often post-SOX</u> and Director and Officer insurance premiums have doubled.
