Answer:Social contextual learning is an Informal learning, it is a peer-to-peer learning and it occurs spontaneously as it is needed.
Guided competency development are formal developments,they defined by the organization as beneficial skills for a wide variety of positions within the company, they are properly fashioned and planned,they do not occur spontaneously and are not driven by peer to peer Interaction.
PARTB
YES, BOTH TYPES OF LEARNING AND ASSOCIATED TRAINING METHODS ARE NECESSARY.
Explanation: Social contextual learning are informal learning approaches which occurs spontaneously as at when needed, this type of learning is usually driven by peer to peer interactions it is necessary and needed for proper social learning.
Guided competency development is a formal approach to development which is guided by the needs of the Organisation,they don't occurs spontaneously and are not peer to peer interaction, it is necessary.
Answer:
(B) reposition
Explanation:
Cadillac's image is being repositioned on the existing market; the brand's reposition occurs when a product needs to increase its scope in the market or improve its position in the top of mind. The reposition includes marketing tactics to recover its recognition in the market and retake its market participation.
Answer:
The adjusting entry at the end of January:
Debit Unearned revenue: $480
Credit Revenue: $480
Explanation:
When recceived $600 on January 15 from customer, the company must record:
Debit Cash: $600
Credit Unearned revenue: $600
because all lessons are not provided by the company, the company can't recording revenue.
On January 31, the company provided 8 lessons, so the company must recording revenue for these lesson (8x$60=$480) by adjusting entry.
Answer:
i think the answer218
Explanation:
if you add 176.000+35.000=211+7=218 you get the right answer
Full Question:
<em>Suppose it is discovered that the first zurvanites were influenced more by indian than by babylonian conceptions of cyclical time. does this discovery support the author's argument?</em>
A: The author does not claim that Zoroaster was the first to proclaim the end of history, just that this claim was one of the “most striking elements” in his teaching (lines 27-29). This discovery would not be inconsistent with the passage.
B: The author suggests that the Zurvanite conception of time as a sentient being was based in Babylonian speculations that time is cyclical, and so unending (lines 29-35). An early Zurvanite denial that history has an end (i.e., a claim that history and time do not end) would strengthen, not weaken the author’s argument.
C: The author very strongly argues that the Zurvanites committed “a deep and grievous heresy” by claiming that the two primal beings were brothers (lines 52-56). If Zoroaster himself made this claim, the Zurvanites would not in fact have “betrayed Zoroaster’s fundamental doctrine.”
D: The author does not argue that Zoroaster had no premonitory inkling of what heresies were to come. This discovery would have no effect on the author’s position.
Answer:
Yes. The author very strongly argues that the Zurvanites committed “a deep and grievous heresy” by claiming that the two primal beings were brothers (lines 52-56). If Zoroaster himself made this claim, the Zurvanites would not in fact have “betrayed Zoroaster’s fundamental doctrine.”
Cheers!
