answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MariettaO [177]
2 years ago
14

Identify at least two points in domini's article where she might have given way to accusation or blame or where she might have d

ismissed the slow food movement as being short-sighted or elitist. discuss how, instead, she finds common ground and promotes dialogue with her audience through civil discourse.
Social Studies
1 answer:
valentina_108 [34]2 years ago
3 0
In Amy’s article on ¨Why investing in fast-food may be a good thing¨ the two points where she might have given way to accusation or blame are the following…

Although we favor local, organic food, we recognize it isn't available in every community, and is often priced above the means of the average household. Many of us live more than 100 miles from a working farm.

The fact that she mentions that it is often 'priced above the means of the average household' may dismiss the movement as elitist.

She finds common ground and promotes civil discourse with her audience immediately in the following paragraph by stating this fact:  

Fast food is a way of life. In America, the average person eats it more than 150 times a year. In 2007, sales for the 400 largest U.S.-based fast-food chains totaled $277 billion, up 7 percent from 2006.

Fast food is a global phenomenon. Major chains and their local competitors open restaurants in nearly every country. For instance, in Greece, burgers and pizza are supplanting the traditional healthy Mediterranean diet of fish, olive oil and vegetables. Doctors are treating Greek children for diabetes, high cholesterol and high blood pressure—ailments rarely seen in the past.

The fast-food industry won't go away anytime soon. But in the meantime, it can be changed. And because it's so enormous, even seemingly modest changes can have a big impact. In 2006, New York City banned the use of trans-fats (a staple of fast food) in restaurants, and in 2008, California became the first state to do so. When McDonald's moved to non-trans fats for making French fries, the health benefits were widespread.

We can also appreciate her point in the conclusion of the article:

While my heart will always be with Slow Food, I recognize the fast-food industry can improve and that some companies are ahead of others on that path.
You might be interested in
Jill stated, "if we allow any form of human cloning, then before we know it there will be armies of clones taking over our jobs.
d1i1m1o1n [39]
I believe the answer is: <span>slippery slope Fallacy

</span><span>slippery slope Fallacy Refers to an argument that sounded correct intially, but often exaggerated to make a minor event appear to be causing consequences that way bigger than it actually does.  </span>We can is this in Jill exaggeration on what the human cloning would do without providing a slightest evidence on her conclusion.
8 0
2 years ago
Sometimes kianna is angry that her parents will not let her date who she pleases. other times she is upset because they do not c
Anna [14]

Answer:

psychological moratorium.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does the writer of the Bloomberg Business article show that he is attempting to be objective?
Kitty [74]

a. he consults well-known, credible sources in his research.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
The _____ is the number of vehicles and pedestrians that pass by the site.
rjkz [21]
The answer is traffic flow. 

An ordinary hindering traffic law says: No individual should drive upon an interstate at such an ease back speed as to obstruct or hinder the typical and sensible development of the movement, aside from when decreased speed is essential for a safe task, on account of a review, or consistence with the law.
3 0
2 years ago
Situation 1
natka813 [3]
<span>Brian thinks that the government’s new law is a good idea because it will reduce the pollution that has had a negative impact on his family. On the other hand, the Pena family is wary of the new law. It will be expensive for them to comply with it. They worry that they will have to lower their other costs to meet the cost of compliance. They will either have to donate less to charities or lay off some of their employees.</span>
3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is at the southwest corner of third and market
    6·1 answer
  • Which circumstance most leads mama to go out and buy a house?
    12·2 answers
  • Biological traits generally follow a geographic continuum, also called a cline. how does this relate to the concept of race?
    12·2 answers
  • By living good lives, Roman Catholics hoped to.. (A. Gain freedom from their lords. (B. Become guild masters. (C. Avoid the Blac
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following leadership theories argues that because of time pressures, leaders establish a special relationship with
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following households most likely has the greatest need for life insurance?
    12·1 answer
  • n the United States, people give high priority to self-development, self-actualization and individual initiative and achievement
    15·1 answer
  • Participants in a classic experiment conducted by Stanley Milgram (1963) found themselves in the uncomfortable position of being
    6·1 answer
  • Raised highway dividers serve the same purpose as ________________. a) Solid white lines b) Solid yellow lines c) Broken white l
    14·1 answer
  • How did the Malcontents direct colonial Georgia's development away from the original goals of the Trustees? Select all that appl
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!