I believe the answer is: <span>slippery slope Fallacy
</span><span>slippery slope Fallacy Refers to an argument that sounded correct intially, but often exaggerated to make a minor event appear to be causing consequences that way bigger than it actually does. </span>We can is this in Jill exaggeration on what the human cloning would do without providing a slightest evidence on her conclusion.
a. he consults well-known, credible sources in his research.
Explanation:
The answer is traffic flow.
An ordinary hindering traffic law says: No individual should drive upon an interstate at such an ease back speed as to obstruct or hinder the typical and sensible development of the movement, aside from when decreased speed is essential for a safe task, on account of a review, or consistence with the law.
<span>Brian thinks that the government’s new law is a good idea because it will reduce the pollution that has had a negative impact on his family. On the other hand, the Pena family is wary of the new law. It will be expensive for them to comply with it. They worry that they will have to lower their other costs to meet the cost of compliance. They will either have to donate less to charities or lay off some of their employees.</span>