Answer: c) predictive validity
Explanation: predictive validity refers to how likely an event is to happen
Answer:
The best answer to the question: Theo would be considered to be a(n) ___ relativist, would be, D: Individual.
Explanation:
Relativism, especially in ethics, means that the understanding of what is right, vs what is wrong, will be relative to certain factors, be them societal, cultural, or individual. The opposite of this would be to accept that ethical values and principles are not dependent on changing, or relative to changing, factors, but are a set of standards that are universal and unmovable. However, Theo not only holds his ethical values relative to what he believes, which is that each person is responsible for developing his/her own ethical rules, but furthermore he understands that each person may judge a situation or a circumstance, under the light of such a personal set of beliefs. Thus, Theo does not believe in universal standards of ethical behavior, but on ethical principles dictated by personalized and individualized views. This is why he would be considered an individual relativist.
Answer:
The answer is D
Explanation:
Katelyn is not putting any effort to do the job by not contributing, but still gets rewarder for the high grade. A free rider is someone who takes credit for a job the person did not do. Katelyn is taking this type of credit, so she is a free- rider.
Answer:
situational influences; personal dispositions
Explanation:
Situational influences refers to temporary condition that influence people's decision making while personal dispositions refers to concrete motives/principles that influences people's decision making.
People generally believe that we make our decisions (such as purchasing decision) based on personal dispositions along. But if situational influences are manipulated properly, it will influence other people without they even realizing it. This is why people often underestimate its impact.
