Answer:
Bounded rationality.
Explanation:
Tonya was feeling the effects of bounded rationality. According to Herbert Simon, people’s rationality is limited when making a decision. The rationality is limited by the information the person has, by the cognitive limitations and the time available to make the decision. In this case, if Tonya had been really rational she would have chosen the overseas company. However, she lacked information about shipment and that uncertainty led her to choose the domestic company instead, even if it had many disadvantages.
By suggesting that she keep a behavior log to determine the cause of this inner guilt.
by asking her to free associate to other situations that led to this feeling.
by helping her tolerate this inner guilt rather than trying to get rid of it.
<span>by challenging her statement and explaining why it is irrational to feel guilty.</span>
Answer:
The answer is - Becomes less dissatisfied and his or her motivation is unaffected
Explanation:
According to Fredrick Herzberg performance, recognition, job status, responsibility and opportunities for growth fall under Motivators or Satisfiers. While Hygiene factors or Dissatisfiers are about salary, secondary working conditions, the relationship with colleagues, physical work place and the relationship between supervisor and employee.
According to his research, he concluded that taking away the dissatisfaction factor does not necessarily mean that employees will be satisfied and to motivate a team using motivation factors the hygiene factors need to be taken care of first. Motivating a team means working on things that bother them and things that they complain about.
Taking away or reducing dissatisfaction does not also guarantee that their motivation will increase. However, when dissatisfaction is taken away then the organisation can focus on motivating employees effectively.
Therefore, an improved salary and working condition will decrease dissatisfaction but the employees motivation will still be unaffected.
Historians use a standard shorthand, “Gold, God, and Glory,” to describe the motives generating the overseas exploration, expansion, and conquests that allowed various European countries to rise to world power between 1400 and 1750. “Gold” refers to the search for material gain through acquiring and selling Asian spices, African slaves, American metals, and other resources. As merchants gained influence in late-medieval western Europe, they convinced their governments to establish a direct connection to the lucrative Asian trade, leading to the first European voyages of discovery in the 1400s. “God” refers to the militant crusading and missionary traditions of Christianity, characterized in part by rivalry with Islam and hatred of non-Christian religions. “Glory” alludes to the competition between monarchies. Some kings sought to establish their claims to newly contacted territories so as to strengthen their position in European politics and increase their power at the expense of the landowning nobility. They also embraced the ideology of mercantilism, which held that governments and large private companies should cooperate to increase the state’s wealth by increasing the reserves of precious metals. Motivated by these three aims, several western European peoples gained control or influence over widening segments of the globe during the Early Modern Era. By 1914 Europeans dominated much of the world politically and economically. Hope this helps!
Answer: Low in Uncertainty Avoidance
Explanation:
Hofstede argued that different societies had different tolerance levels and that their tolerance levels usually show themselves in certain ways.
Uncertainty Avoidance is one of those days and measures the degree to which a society avoids risky ventures. A society HIGH in Uncertainty Avoidance will seek to avoid risky ventures and sometimes even enact legislature against it. A society LOW in Uncertainty Avoidance will accept risky ventures which can sometimes correspond with innovative, and deviant behavior.
