This is basically telling you to read the passage and filling the blanks with words you see in the passage hope this helps
Answer: 1. incorrect explanation construction, 2. split infinitive 3. dangling construction 4. poor parallel structure
Explanation:
1.uses is when or is where <u>matches</u> with incorrect explanation construction
2.occurs when an adverb or other word is placed between to and the verb <u>matches</u> with split infinitive
3. does not clearly connect to the word or phrase for which it was intended <u>matches</u> with dangling construction
4. uses dissimilar grammatical constructions <u>matches</u> with poor parallel structure
1. Incorrect explanation construction matches with when or where because those are the words used when it comes to incorrect explanation of some construction in the sentence. Incorrect tenses are one of the usual issues when it comes to grammar.
2. When we have in the sentences 'to' places between verb and adverb that is making a split infinitive. For example, We were told to read each book correctly.
3. Dangling construction is considering group of modifier words instead of noun or phrase in the sentence. The modifier is used to describe a noun or phrase.
4. When it comes to parallel structure, there are sentences that have the same or equivalent meaning but they are not similar grammatically and that is why it is called dissimilar construction.
Ted Koppel seems to be quite an interesting character to develop a parallel plot to the one in the book. Koppel´s life as one of the most famous living television interviewers is a great source for a second plot. He and Morrie cross paths .Ted´s newly found friendship with Morrie affects his life and deconstructs his narcissistic television personality making him change directions in his life.
I think 1 is non-sequitur and 2 is ad hominem. Ad hominem is when you attack the person rather than their position on the issue. In #2 their verbally attacking the person for not supporting veterans.
