All categories

2 years ago

Why did farmer jones keep the chickens away frome the other animals

Mathematics

1 answer:

max2010maxim [7]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

The farmer jones keep the chickens away frome the other animals because the chickens are using "fowl" language!!!!!

The answer to your math sheet is a play on words, please check the picture attached for the complete solution.

The joke is that 'fowl' is another word for 'chicken' but at the same time is similar to 'foul' which is a bad word!

You might be interested in

To support a tree damaged in a storm, a 12-foot wire is secured from the ground to the tree at a point 10 feet off the ground. T

Nina [5.8K]

Given:
<span>12-foot wire is secured from the ground to the tree at a point 10 feet off the ground.
The tree meets the ground at a right angle.

When you visualize the scenario, the 12 foot wire would be the measure of the hypotenuse and the 10 feet off the ground will be the short leg or opposite. The long leg or adjacent is unknown.

We need to solve for sine theta because the value of hypotenuse and opposite is given.

sin </span>θ = opposite / hypotenuse
sin θ = 10 feet / 12 feet
sin θ = 0.833
θ = 0.83 / sin
θ = 56°

The wire would meet the ground at approximately 56° angle.

3 0

2 years ago

Use the graph to approximate the ordered pair where the exponential function begins to exceed the quadratic function. a. (2.5,5)

riadik2000 [5.3K]

Answer:

a. (2.5,5)

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x) exponential function exceed quadratic function g(x) at (2.5 , 5)

7 0

2 years ago

This morning, Sam walked 4 kilometers in 50 minutes. At what rate did Sam walk? Use the formula r=d/t, where r is the rate, d is

kicyunya [14]

0.08 km/minute.........................

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A certain cylindrical tank holds 20,000 gallons of water which can be drained from the bottom of the tank in 20 minutes the volu

vazorg [7]

Answer:

Impossible. t=30 minutes.

Step-by-step explanation:

We have the function:

$v(t)=20000(1-\frac{t}{20})^2$

Where v(t) represents the amount of gallons remaining after t minutes.

We want to find at what time t is the <em>instanteous </em>rate of change from the tank 1000 gallons per minute.

In order to determine the instantaneous rate of change, let's find the derivative of our function. So, take the derivative of both sides with respect to our time t:

$\frac{d}{dt}[v(t)]=\frac{d}{dt}(20000(1-\frac{t}{20})^2]$

On the right, let's move the coefficient outside:

$v'(t)=20000\frac{d}{dt}[(1-\frac{t}{20})^2]$

To differentiate, let's use the chain rule, which is:

$u(v(x))=u'(v(x))\cdot v'(x)$

Our u(x) is x² and v(x) is (1-t/20). So, u'(x) is 2x and v'(x) is -1/20. Therefore:

$v'(t)=20000(2(1-\frac{t}{20})\cdot -\frac{1}{20})$

Simplify:

$v'(t)=-1000(2(1-\frac{t}{20}))$

Simplify:

$v'(t)=-1000(2-\frac{t}{10})$

Distribute:

$v'(t)=100t-2000$

So, the instantaneous rate of change after time t is given by the above function.

To find when the instantaneous rate of change of the water is 1000 gallons per minute, substitute 100 for v'(t) and solve for t. So:

$1000=100t-2000$

Solve for t. Add 2000 to both sides:

$3000=100t$

Divide both sides by 100:

$t=30$

So, after 30 minutes, the instantaneous rate of change will be 1000 gallons per minute.

However, if we go back to our original function, our domain t is only defined between 0 and 20 minutes.

So, it is impossible for our instantaneous rate of change to ever reach 1000 gallons per minute.

6 0

2 years ago

Angie and Becky each completed a separate proof to show that the measures of vertical angles AKG and HKB are equal. Who complete

kykrilka [37]

Answer:

Becky, because her reason I'm step 2 does not justify her 2ndbstatement.

Step-by-step explanation:

Two angles which add up to give 180° are said to be defined as supplementary angles.

The Definition of Supplementary Angles is the most appropriate statement to justify the second statement in the proof, as written by Angie, compared to the Angle Addition Postulate stated by Becky.

The Angle Addition Postulate does not justify why the two of angles both equal 180°. According to the Angle Anldditiin Postulate, sum of 2 angles that share the same side can does not necessarily have to be 180°. It could be less than or greater than 180°.

Therefore, Becky completed her proof incorrectly.

8 0

2 years ago